FLAIR MR Imaging for Diagnosing Intracranial Meningeal Carcinomatosis

The purpose of this study was to compare unenhanced and contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging with other sequences to visualize meningeal carcinomatosis. Unenhanced FLAIR images were compared with spin echo T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced FLAIR images in five patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 176; no. 6; pp. 1585 - 1588
Main Authors: Tsuchiya, Kazuhiro, Katase, Shichiro, Yoshino, Ayako, Hachiya, Junichi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01-06-2001
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare unenhanced and contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging with other sequences to visualize meningeal carcinomatosis. Unenhanced FLAIR images were compared with spin echo T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced FLAIR images in five patients with documented meningeal carcinomatosis and four patients with suspected meningeal carcinomatosis. Comparisons were also made between contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR images. In six patients, the unenhanced FLAIR images showed areas of abnormal hyperintensity within the sulci that were not noted on the spin-echo T2-weighted images. In all patients, the contrast-enhanced FLAIR images also showed meningeal enhancement, periventricular enhancement, or both. The contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR images were equivalent in their depiction of abnormal enhancement in five of the nine patients; contrast-enhanced FLAIR images were superior in three patients. Unenhanced FLAIR images are of more value than spin-echo T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of intracranial meningeal carcinomatosis. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR images can sometimes surpass contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in their quality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI:10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761585