Discerning the dietary habits of the smooth butterfly ray Gymnura lessae using two distinct methods, otolith identification and metagenetics

Two different methods, metagenetics and free‐otolith identification, were used to identify prey in the stomach contents of 531 Gymnura lessae captured by trawling in Mobile Bay, Alabama 2016–2018. Both methods were found to produce analogous results and were therefore combined into a single complete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of fish biology Vol. 96; no. 2; pp. 434 - 443
Main Authors: Jargowsky, Matthew B., Cooper, Pearce T., Ajemian, Matthew J., Colvin, Michael E., Drymon, J. Marcus
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-02-2020
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two different methods, metagenetics and free‐otolith identification, were used to identify prey in the stomach contents of 531 Gymnura lessae captured by trawling in Mobile Bay, Alabama 2016–2018. Both methods were found to produce analogous results and were therefore combined into a single complete dataset. All prey were teleosts; the families Sciaenidae and Engraulidae were the most important prey (prey specie index of relative importance 89.3% IPSRI). Multivariate analyses indicated that the diet of G. lessae varied with sex and seasonality. Specifically, variability was probably due to morphologically larger females consuming larger teleost prey species compared with males, whereas seasonal variability was probably due to changes in the available prey community composition. The findings indicate that both metagenetics and free otolith identification, used independently or complementarily, offer robust means of characterising dietary habits for teleost‐specialised species such as G. lessae, which may play an important role in the structure and maintenance of coastal food webs such as those in Mobile Bay.
Bibliography:Funding information
a grant from the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Marine Resources Division through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Gulf Environmental Benefits Fund.
Funding for this study was provided
via
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1112
1095-8649
DOI:10.1111/jfb.14221