Private landowner interest in prescribed fire in California: findings from workshops in the Sierra Nevada

• Published in: Fire ecology Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 48
• Main Authors: Wilkin, Kate M., Stasiewicz, Amanda M., Kocher, Susan D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-12-2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomedical and Life Sciences; Burning; Controlled burning; Ecology; Environmental risk; Fire hazards; Forestry; Government programs; Health hazards; Invasive plants; Land management; Land use planning; Life Sciences; Managers; Prescribed fire; Private lands; Public lands; Technical Note; Wildfires; Workshops; United States > US; California; Nevada; Private lands; Cooperative extension; Capacity building; Prescribed fire; Workshops; California; Wildfire risk reduction; Sierra Nevada Mountains
• ISSN: 1933-9747; 1933-9747
• DOI: 10.1186/s42408-024-00277-9

Background
Globally, prescribed fire political interest and practice has been rekindled following recent devastating wildfire seasons. This phenomenon was especially acute in areas with dual wildfire and forest health crises, like California. Previous research has investigated prescribed fire on public lands or on private lands in other regions, but little is known about prescribed fire practice or interest on private lands in California. Therefore, we sought to understand private land managers’ perceptions of prescribed fire compared to other land management techniques, treatment pathways, motivations, and barriers to complete these treatments in California.
Results
Before workshops on prescribed fire for private lands, we surveyed participants in six prescribed fires on private lands workshops in the Central Sierra Nevada from 2018 to 2019 (
N
 = 172). We found that participants “want to use” pile burns and broadcast prescribed fires more than other land management treatments. There was also a strong interest in mechanical treatments in contrast to low interest in grazing. Some participants had “heard about” and “want to use” some pathways to apply prescribed fire on their lands, including government programs, contractors, friends and family, and Prescribed Burn Associations (PBAs). People had multiple objectives for their prescribed fire goals, and the majority wanted to promote ecosystem health, e.g., reduce fire hazards, foster natural land health, and reduce invasive plants. Perceived barriers were greatest for safety, cost, and resources while fewer participants perceived permits as a barrier.
Conclusion
Participants were in the early stages of considering using broadcast prescribed fire and would like to burn small areas, potentially to build confidence and skills. At the time of our research, there was strong interest in using prescribed fire on private lands, and some perceived best pathways and barriers to be unique from prescribed fire practice on public lands. At the same time, private lands managers who responded said they want to promote ecosystem health and reduce wildfire risk and impacts, which is a shared a common motivation with public lands managers. Studies and reports on prescribed burning need to clearly distinguish between broadcast prescribed burning and pile burning to ensure consistency in results and conclusions about prescribed fire use.