Serologic Monitoring of Public Health Interventions against Strongyloides stercoralis

• Published in: The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Vol. 97; no. 1; pp. 166 - 172
• Main Authors: Vargas, Paola, Krolewiecki, Alejandro J, Echazú, Adriana, Juarez, Marisa, Cajal, Pamela, Gil, Jose F, Caro, Nicolás, Nasser, Julio, Lammie, Patrick, Cimino, Rubén O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 01-07-2017
• Subjects: Adolescent; Animals; Anthelmintics - therapeutic use; Antibodies, Helminth - blood; Argentina - epidemiology; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Public Health - methods; Seroepidemiologic Studies; Strongyloides stercoralis; Strongyloidiasis - drug therapy; Strongyloidiasis - epidemiology; Strongyloidiasis - prevention & control
• ISSN: 0002-9637; 1476-1645
• DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0857

Northwestern Argentina is endemic for soil-transmitted helminths, and annual deworming programs are carried out in prioritized areas. High prevalence of
was reported in this area; therefore, control programs including ivermectin are being evaluated. The NIE-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for this purpose. In this community trial, two groups of patients, classified according to housing and living conditions were evaluated. Simultaneous with baseline survey, Group 1 was moved to new households with access to improved water and sanitation facilities (W and S), where deworming (MDA, massive drug administration) took place within 1 month; whereas Group 2 received MDA but remained living with unimproved W and S. The mean time interval between baseline and the follow-up was 331 days for Group 1 and 508 for Group 2. Anti-NIE levels were measured for each individual before and after interventions and follow-up optical density (OD) ratios were calculated to quantify the variation. A significant decrease of the anti-NIE levels between baseline and follow-up was observed in both groups. Nonetheless, the number of patients that achieved the cure criteria (OD ratio < 0.6) was higher in Group 1 than Group 2 with values of 72.7% (24/33) and 45.0% (18/40), respectively (
= 0.0197). Our results support the conclusion that a combined intervention including deworming and improvements in life conditions is more effective, in terms of the proportion of subjects cured than deworming alone. Furthermore, we found that NIE-ELISA is a useful test for assessing the response to treatment and to evaluate the outcome of control intervention programs.