Most Frequent Value Statistics and the Hubble Constant
The measurement of Hubble constant (H0) is clearly a very important task in astrophysics and cosmology. Based on the principle of minimization of the information loss, we propose a robust most frequent value (MFV) procedure to determine H0, regardless of the Gaussian or non-Gaussian distributions. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Vol. 130; no. 990; pp. 84502 - 84510 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Philadelphia
The Astronomical Society of the Pacific
01-08-2018
IOP Publishing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The measurement of Hubble constant (H0) is clearly a very important task in astrophysics and cosmology. Based on the principle of minimization of the information loss, we propose a robust most frequent value (MFV) procedure to determine H0, regardless of the Gaussian or non-Gaussian distributions. The updated data set of H0 contains the 591 measurements including the extensive compilations of Huchra and other researchers. The calculated result of the MFV is H0 = 67.498 km s−1 Mpc−1, which is very close to the average value of recent Planck H0 value (67.81 0.92 km s−1 Mpc−1 and 66.93 0.62 km s−1 Mpc−1) and Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results. Furthermore, we apply the bootstrap method to estimate the uncertainty of the MFV of H0 under different conditions, and find that the 95% confidence interval for the MFV of H0 measurements is [66.319, 68.690] associated with statistical bootstrap errors, while a systematically larger estimate is H 0 = 67.498 − 3.278 + 7.970 (systematic uncertainty). Especially, the non-Normality of error distribution is again verified via the empirical distribution function test including Shapiro-Wilk test and Anderson-Darling test. These results illustrate that the MFV algorithm has many advantages in the analysis of such statistical problems, no matter what the distributions of the original measurements are. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | PASP-100513.R2 |
ISSN: | 0004-6280 1538-3873 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1538-3873/aac767 |