Ipsilateral lung normal tissue complication probability parameters for different dose calculation algorithms in radiotherapy of breast cancer

• Published in: Journal of cancer research and therapeutics Vol. 16; no. 6; pp. 1323 - 1330
• Main Authors: Kavousi, Nasim, Nedaie, Hassan, Gholami, Somayeh, Esfahani, Mahbod, Shafiekhani, Sajad, Hassani, Mohssen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01-10-2020; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
• Subjects: Algorithms; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Female; Humans; Lung - radiation effects; Monte Carlo Method; Probability; Radiation therapy; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; ipsilateral lung normal tissue; Dose calculation algorithm; Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model; normal tissue complication probability
• ISSN: 0973-1482; 1998-4138
• DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1149_19

Purpose: Different dose calculation algorithms (DCAs) predict different dose distributions for the same treatment. Awareness of optimal model parameters is vital for estimating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for different algorithms. The aim is to determine the NTCP parameter values for different DCAs in left-sided breast radiotherapy, using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model.
Materials and Methods: First, the methodology recommended by International Atomic Energy Agency TEC-DOC 1583 was used to establish the accuracy of dose calculations of different DCAs including: Monte Carlo (MC) and collapsed cone algorithms implemented in Monaco, pencil beam convolution (PBC) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) implemented in Eclipse, and superposition and Clarkson algorithms implemented in PCRT3D treatment planning systems (TPSs). Then, treatment planning of 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer was performed by the mentioned DCAs and NTCP of the left-lung normal tissue were calculated for each patient individually, using the LKB model. For the PB algorithm, the NTCP parameters were taken from previously published values and new model parameters obtained for each DCA, using the iterative least squares methods.
Results: For all cases and DCAs, NTCP computation with the same model parameters resulted in >15% deviation in NTCP values. The new NTCP model parameters were classified according to the algorithm type. Thus, the discrepancy of NTCP computations was reduced up to 5% after utilizing adjusted model parameters.
Conclusions: This paper confirms that the NTCP values for a given treatment type are different for the different DCAs. Thus, it is essential to introduce appropriate NTCP parameter values according to DCA adopted in TPS, to obtain a more precise estimation of lung NTCP. Hence, new parameter values, classified according to the DCAs, must be determined before introducing NTCP estimation in clinical practice.