Patterns of care and outcomes of radiotherapy for lymph node positivity after radical prostatectomy

Objective To evaluate the use and outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) for men with lymph node (LN)‐positive disease after radical prostatectomy (RP) using a population‐based approach. Patients and Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked data from 1995 to 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJU international Vol. 111; no. 8; pp. 1208 - 1214
Main Authors: Kaplan, Joshua R., Kowalczyk, Keith J., Borza, Tudor, Gu, Xiangmei, Lipsitz, Stuart R., Nguyen, Paul L., Friedlander, David F., Trinh, Quoc‐Dien, Hu, Jim C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Wiley-Blackwell 01-06-2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To evaluate the use and outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) for men with lymph node (LN)‐positive disease after radical prostatectomy (RP) using a population‐based approach. Patients and Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked data from 1995 to 2007 was used to identify 577 men with LN metastases discovered during RP and absence of distant metastases, of which 177 underwent ART ≤1 year of RP. Propensity score models were used to compare overall mortality and prostate cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) for men that did and those that did not receive ART. Results Men in both groups received adjuvant androgen‐deprivation therapy at similar rates after propensity weighting adjustments (33.6% vs 33.7%, P = 0.977). ART was not associated with differences in overall (5.09 vs 3.77 events per 100 person‐years, P = 0.153) or PCSM (2.89 vs 1.31, P = 0.090) relative to men who did not receive ART. Conclusions ART after RP in men with LN‐positive prostate cancer was not associated with improved overall or disease‐specific survival, in contrast to previous single‐centre studies. Prospective randomised studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of ART in this patient population.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/bju.12079