Seismic behavior of geosynthetic encased columns and ordinary stone columns

• Published in: Geotextiles and geomembranes Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 40 - 51
• Main Authors: Cengiz, C., Güler, E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Essex Elsevier Ltd 01-02-2018; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Casing (process); Clay; Confining; Consolidation; Earthquake loading; GEC; Geosynthetics; Kaolinite; Load tests; Model tests; Seismic energy; Seismic engineering; Seismic response; Shake table tests; Shaking; Shaking table; Stone columns; Strain gauges; Studies; Vertical loads; Model tests; Geosynthetics; Shaking table; Earthquake loading; GEC
• ISSN: 0266-1144; 1879-3584
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.10.001

This study is concerned with evaluating and comparing the behavior of geosynthetic encased stone columns (GECs) and ordinary (conventional) stone columns (OSCs) during and after seismic excitations. For this purpose, well instrumented GECs and OSCs are installed in kaolinite clay beds consolidated in a large steel tank. In order to simulate the seismic behavior of columns supporting an embankment, surcharge loads are applied and the experimental setup is subjected to large-scale shaking table tests. The strains in the encasement are measured by making use of water-proof strain gauges during the course of the experiments. The vertical load capacities of GECs and OSCs after the seismic excitation were measured by a series of stress controlled column load tests. The experimental data at hand suggests that under the action of seismic loads there is a significant strain demand on the encasement confining the GECs. An almost linear relationship between the seismic energy input expressed in terms of IA (Arias Intensity) and reinforcement strain amplitude is observed. GECs in general have exhibited a superior performance both under static and seismic loads when compared to OSCs.