Unexpected Tigecycline Resistance Among Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates: High Minor Error Rate by Etest

Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of chemotherapy (Florence) Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 390 - 395
Main Authors: Kulah, C., Celebi, G., Aktas, E., Mengeloglu, Z., Comert, F., Ankarali, H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze Taylor & Francis 01-08-2009
EIFT
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as well as susceptibility testing methods and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints. Reference broth microdilution (BMD), etest and DD methods were used. MIC 50 and MIC 90 by the reference method were 1 and 8? μg/ml, respectively. Applying the breakpoints for Enterobactericeae, 85.7% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline. The Etest resulted in lower susceptibility rates (63.7%). Essential agreement between Etest and BMD was 75.8%. 21.9% of the strains were susceptible by BMD and intermediate by Etest. Provisional DD breakpoints ≥19/≤14 mm produced unacceptable minor errors while adjustment to ≥17/≤13 mm yielded the best results. In conclusion, resistance was not rare against our MDR A. baumanniiisolates although tigecycline had not been used previously. Breakpoints ≥17/≤13 mm may be preferred for DD. We suggest caution with intermediate results by Etest.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1120-009X
1973-9478
DOI:10.1179/joc.2009.21.4.390