Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Support for Redistribution: The role of Existential and Utopian Standards

• Published in: Social justice research Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 335 - 354
• Main Authors: García-Sánchez, Efraín, Willis, Guillermo B., Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa, Palacio Sañudo, Jorge, David Polo, Jean, Rentería Pérez, Erico
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01-12-2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acceptance; Anthropology; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Beliefs; Economic conditions; Economic inequality; Economic systems; Economics; Financial support; Ideology; Income distribution; Income inequality; Inequality; Justification; Personality and Social Psychology; Philosophy; Political Science; Process analysis; Psychology; Public opinion; Redistribution; Social Policy; Sociology; Utopias; Economic inequality; Existential and utopian standards; Perception; Redistribution; Ideology
• ISSN: 0885-7466; 1573-6725
• DOI: 10.1007/s11211-018-0317-6

Perceived greater economic inequality is supposedly associated with higher demand for redistribution. However, the findings in the literature are mixed in this regard, with some researchers providing evidence in favour of this association and some findings evidence against it. Given that perceived economic inequality and endorsement of system-justifying beliefs are related to increased inequality acceptance, we explore the interplay between them in relation to support for redistribution. This study is intended to shed light on the role of utopian standards (ideal estimates about what ought to be) as one mechanism that affects the relationship between perceived greater economic inequality and support for redistribution. Based on correlational data (
N
 = 794), we conducted a conditional process analysis and found that perceived greater inequality displayed a negative indirect effect on support for redistribution, through acceptance of ideal level of economic inequality: Perception of higher inequality was related to increased ideal levels of inequality and thus with lower support for redistribution. In addition, we found that economic system-justifying beliefs conditioned the effect of perceived economic inequality in two ways: First, perceived economic inequality was positively associated with higher acceptance of inequality, and this association was stronger for those that justified the economic system more, and perceived greater inequality was associated with higher support for redistribution—but only for those who endorsed lower levels of economic system justification beliefs. These findings provide evidence that perceived greater economic inequality does not in itself lead to a push for more redistribution; rather, utopian standards such as ideal estimates of economic inequality, which are conditioned by system-justifying ideologies.