Mesiodistal width and proximal enamel thickness of maxillary first bicuspids

• Published in: Brazilian oral research Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 58 - 63
• Main Authors: Macha, Aurélio de Carvalho, Vellini-Ferreira, Flávio, Scavone-Junior, Helio, Ferreira, Rívea Inês
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 01-03-2010; Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
• Subjects: Adult; Bicuspid; Bicuspid - anatomy & histology; Dental enamel; Dental Enamel - anatomy & histology; Dentistry; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Odontometry; Orthodontics; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Tooth crown; Tooth Crown - anatomy & histology; Young Adult; Bicuspid; Dental enamel; Tooth crown; Orthodontics
• DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242010000100010
• EISSN: 1807-3107; 1806-8324
• ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107

This study aimed at evaluating measurements relative to the mesiodistal crown width and enamel thickness of maxillary first bicuspids. The sample consisted of 40 extracted sound bicuspids (20 right and 20 left), selected from white patients (mean age: 23.7 +/- 4.2 years), who were treated orthodontically with tooth extraction at a private clinic in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. All teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and cut along their long axis through the proximal surfaces, parallel to the buccal side, to obtain 0.6-mm central sections. The mesiodistal crown width and proximal enamel thickness were measured using a stereoscopic microscope connected to a computer. Measurements for right and left teeth, as well as the mesial and distal enamel thicknesses in the total sample, were compared by the Wilcoxon test (alpha = 0.05). The mesiodistal crown width mean values found were 7.51 mm (+/- 0.54) on the right side and 7.53 mm (+/- 0.35) on the left side. The mean enamel thickness on the distal surfaces for both sides was 1.29 mm (right: s.d. = 0.12 and left: s.d. = 0.18). The mean values for the mesial surfaces were 1.08 mm (+/- 0.14) and 1.19 mm (+/- 0.25), on the right and the left sides, respectively. No significant differences were found between the crown measurements and enamel thicknesses on the left and right sides. However, enamel thickness was significantly greater on the distal surfaces. Reliable measurements of enamel thickness are useful to guide stripping, which may be an attractive alternative to tooth extraction because it allows the transverse arch dimension to be maintained.