Reduced incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation with angiotensin II receptor blockade: the VALUE trial
BACKGROUNDAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and increases cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Therefore, in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) a prespecified objective was to compare the effects of valsartan and amlodipine on new-onset AF....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hypertension Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 403 - 411 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hagerstown, MD
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc
01-03-2008
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUNDAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and increases cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Therefore, in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) a prespecified objective was to compare the effects of valsartan and amlodipine on new-onset AF.
METHODSA total of 15 245 hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk received valsartan 80–160 mg/day or amlodipine 5–10 mg/day combined with additional antihypertensive agents. Electrocardiograms were obtained every year and analyzed centrally for evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy and new-onset AF.
RESULTSAt baseline, AF was diagnosed in 2.6% of 7649 valsartan recipients and 2.6% of 7596 amlodipine recipients. During antihypertensive treatment the incidence of at least one documented occurrence of new-onset AF was 3.67% with valsartan and 4.34% with amlodipine {unadjusted hazard ratio 0.843, [95% confidence interval (CI)0.713, 0.997], P = 0.0455}. The incidence of persistent AF was 1.35% with valsartan and 1.97% with amlodipine [unadjusted hazard ratio 0.683 (95% CI0.525, 0.889), P = 0.0046].
CONCLUSIONSValsartan-based treatment reduced the development of new-onset AF, particularly sustained AF in hypertensive patients, compared with amlodipine-based therapy. These findings suggest that angiotensin II receptor blockers may result in greater benefits than calcium antagonists in hypertensive patients at risk of new-onset AF. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0263-6352 1473-5598 |
DOI: | 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f35c67 |