Lexicography and degeneracy: can a pure cutting plane algorithm work?

We discuss an implementation of the lexicographic version of Gomory’s fractional cutting plane method for ILP problems and of two heuristics mimicking the latter. In computational testing on a battery of MIPLIB problems we compare the performance of these variants with that of the standard Gomory al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mathematical programming Vol. 130; no. 1; pp. 153 - 176
Main Authors: Zanette, Arrigo, Fischetti, Matteo, Balas, Egon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01-11-2011
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We discuss an implementation of the lexicographic version of Gomory’s fractional cutting plane method for ILP problems and of two heuristics mimicking the latter. In computational testing on a battery of MIPLIB problems we compare the performance of these variants with that of the standard Gomory algorithm, both in the single-cut and in the multi-cut (rounds of cuts) version, and show that they provide a radical improvement over the standard procedure. In particular, we report the exact solution of ILP instances from MIPLIB such as stein15, stein27, and bm23, for which the standard Gomory cutting plane algorithm is not able to close more than a tiny fraction of the integrality gap. We also offer an explanation for this surprising phenomenon.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0025-5610
1436-4646
DOI:10.1007/s10107-009-0335-0