Comparison and integration of first trimester fetal nuchal translucency and second trimester maternal serum screening for fetal Down syndrome

Background It is uncertain whether first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) is more effective than the well‐established second trimester serum screening for fetal Down syndrome or whether their combination works best. We report data from a large multicentre non‐interventional trial in which all subj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Prenatal diagnosis Vol. 22; no. 8; pp. 730 - 735
Main Authors: Hang Lam, Yung, Peng Lee, Chin, Yuen Sin, Sai, Tang, Rebecca, Soo Wong, Hong, Fun Wong, Sai, Yee Tak Fong, Danial, Hoi Yin Tang, Mary, Hai Nin Woo, Hennie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-08-2002
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background It is uncertain whether first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) is more effective than the well‐established second trimester serum screening for fetal Down syndrome or whether their combination works best. We report data from a large multicentre non‐interventional trial in which all subjects underwent both first and second trimester screening. Methods All women who attended the obstetric clinic before 15 weeks' gestation were recruited. An ultrasound examination was performed at 10 to 14 weeks to measure the NT. The nuchal measurements were not acted upon unless the fetus showed gross features of hydrops fetalis. All women had serum alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) assay at 15 to 20 weeks. The Down syndrome risk assigned by serum screening was disclosed and amniocentesis was offered if this assigned risk was ⩾1:250 or if the women were 35 years and older. The efficacy of different combinations of screening markers was compared. Results Between January 1997 and August 2000, 17 590 women were recruited (19% ⩾35 years old). After excluding subjects who miscarried, defaulted the serum test and other reasons, 16 237 pregnancies were analysed. Of these, 35 pregnancies were affected by Down syndrome (2.2 cases per 1000 pregnancies). At a false‐positive rate of 5%, the detection rate of Down syndrome by NT alone, NT and age, serum hCG, AFP and age, and NT, hCG, AFP and age were 61%, 69%, 73% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Integration of NT and second trimester serum AFP and hCG assay yielded the best screening efficacy for Down syndrome. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
istex:6BB1F9C94B86925109B79467656A79712E2B8410
ark:/67375/WNG-99V2B2NH-T
ArticleID:PD382
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0197-3851
1097-0223
DOI:10.1002/pd.382