Waveform Approach for Assessing Conformity of CISPR 16-1-1 Measuring Receivers
An alternative approach for assessing the conformity of electromagnetic interference measuring receivers with respect to the baseline CISPR 16-1-1 requirements is proposed. The method's core is based on the generation of digitally synthesized complex waveforms comprising multisine excitation si...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement Vol. 67; no. 5; pp. 1187 - 1198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article Publication |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
IEEE
01-05-2018
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An alternative approach for assessing the conformity of electromagnetic interference measuring receivers with respect to the baseline CISPR 16-1-1 requirements is proposed. The method's core is based on the generation of digitally synthesized complex waveforms comprising multisine excitation signals and modulated pulses. The superposition of multiple narrowband reference signals populating the standard frequency bands allows for a single-stage evaluation of the receiver's voltage accuracy and frequency selectivity. Moreover, characterizing the response of the weighting detectors using modulated pulses is more repeatable and less restrictive than the conventional approach. This methodology significantly reduces the amount of time required to complete the verification of the receiver's baseline magnitudes, because time-domain measurements enable a broadband assessment while the typical calibration methodology follows the time-consuming narrow band frequency sweep scheme. Since the reference signals are generated using arbitrary waveform generators, they can be easily reproduced from a standard numerical vector. For different test receivers, the results of such assessment are presented in the 9 kHz-1 GHz frequency range. Finally, a discussion on the measurement uncertainty of this methodology for assessing measuring receivers is given. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9456 1557-9662 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TIM.2018.2794941 |