Use of Liveweight Change as an Indicator of Oestrus in a Seasonally Calving, Pasture‐Fed Dairy Herd

This was an observational study of 828 lactations in 542 mixed‐age dairy cows that calved seasonally in a single, pasture‐fed herd in New Zealand in 2008 and 2009. The study objectives were to: (i) document daily liveweight change (∆LW) before and after observed oestrus for cows subsequently diagnos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reproduction in domestic animals Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 362 - 369
Main Authors: Alawneh, JI, Stevenson, MA, Williamson, NB, Lopez‐Villalobos, N
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Germany Blackwell Science 01-06-2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This was an observational study of 828 lactations in 542 mixed‐age dairy cows that calved seasonally in a single, pasture‐fed herd in New Zealand in 2008 and 2009. The study objectives were to: (i) document daily liveweight change (∆LW) before and after observed oestrus for cows subsequently diagnosed pregnant or non‐pregnant and (ii) quantify the sensitivity and specificity of ∆LW as a test for oestrus. The sensitivity and specificity of ∆LW when combined with other commonly used oestrous detection methods was also evaluated. In cows that conceived as a result of service at detected oestrus, liveweight loss began 1 day before the day of detection and was greatest on the day of detection (−9.6 kg, 95% CI −11.3 kg to −7.8 kg; p < 0.01) compared with LW recorded 2 days before the day of detection. In cows that did not conceive to a service at a detected oestrus, the lowest liveweights were recorded 1 day before the day oestrus was detected (−4.3 kg, 95% CI −7.7 to −0.8 kg; p = 0.02) compared with LW recorded 4 days before the day of detection. The sensitivity and specificity of ∆LW as a means of oestrous detection were 0.42 (95% CI 0.40–0.45) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.95–0.97), respectively. When ∆LW was combined with tail paint and visual observation, the oestrous detection sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 and 0.94, respectively. Monitoring LW change holds promise to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of oestrous detection in combination with other oestrous detection methods.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.12278
ArticleID:RDA12278
ark:/67375/WNG-4FP1BVN0-M
istex:7ED635C3027DB1190AAA2645AA51C8F414A49255
Tru-Test®, New Zealand
Foundation for Research Science and Technology
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0936-6768
1439-0531
DOI:10.1111/rda.12278