CT of sacral injury

Eighty-eight patients with 188 sacral fractures were examined with computed tomography (CT) and conventional radiography. Four main patterns of sacral injury were defined: sacroiliac diastasis (39%), sacral and/or iliac lip fractures (25%), vertical shear fractures (25%), and comminuted fractures (5...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiology Vol. 161; no. 2; p. 499
Main Authors: Montana, M A, Richardson, M L, Kilcoyne, R F, Harley, J D, Shuman, W P, Mack, L A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-11-1986
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Eighty-eight patients with 188 sacral fractures were examined with computed tomography (CT) and conventional radiography. Four main patterns of sacral injury were defined: sacroiliac diastasis (39%), sacral and/or iliac lip fractures (25%), vertical shear fractures (25%), and comminuted fractures (5%). Initial interpretation of plain radiographs failed to define 29% of the sacroiliac joint diastases, 57% of the lip fractures, 34% of the vertical shear fractures, and 25% of the comminuted fractures. The extent of injury was better delineated with CT, and a more certain diagnosis of sacral injury was possible with CT than with radiography. Because of the higher detection rate and improved imaging of fracture configuration, CT should be performed in all patients with sacral injury.
ISSN:0033-8419
DOI:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763921