Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: Role of transportation and communication networks

•Choice of marketing channels varies by farmer and location characteristics.•Poor transport and communication networks restrict farmers’ market access.•Lack of infrastructure and information lead to rent seeking by informal buyers.•Most farmers particularly smallholders get lower than government man...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food policy Vol. 81; pp. 106 - 121
Main Authors: Negi, Digvijay S., Birthal, Pratap S., Roy, Devesh, Khan, Md. Tajuddin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Choice of marketing channels varies by farmer and location characteristics.•Poor transport and communication networks restrict farmers’ market access.•Lack of infrastructure and information lead to rent seeking by informal buyers.•Most farmers particularly smallholders get lower than government mandated price. This paper assesses the effect of transportation and communication networks on farmers’ choice of market channels for paddy and wheat, and subsequently on the prices they receive from these channels. It is found that smallholder farmers sell more to informal channels i.e. local traders and input dealers, and typically receive lower prices from them compared to the government-set minimum support prices (MSP). The prices realized from the sales in regulated markets are also less than the MSP despite these being claimed to be more transparent in price discovery. Econometric results show that farmers’ access to transportation and information enables them to obtain better price terms from informal as well as formal channels. The effect of information is relatively stronger, implying that farmers’ access to transportation itself is not sufficient but is effective when combined with provision of market information. Further, our proposition is that despite a positive impact of the improved market access on price realization from informal traders, farmer-trader relations are unlikely to undergo a meaningful change because of the tied transactions involving inputs, credit and outputs.
ISSN:0306-9192
1873-5657
DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.008