Less postoperative nausea and vomiting after propofol + remifentanil versus propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia during plastic surgery
Background: The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Method...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 305 - 311 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK; Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc
01-03-2005
Blackwell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background: The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement.
Methods: Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 µg kg−1) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 µg kg−1). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was ≥ 4 (scale 0–10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented ≥ 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2–12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0–2‐h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12–24‐h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1).
Conclusion: Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background:
The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement.
Methods:
Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 µg kg
−1
) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 µg kg
−1
). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was ≥ 4 (scale 0–10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented ≥ 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide.
P
< 0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2–12 h postoperative hours' interval; (
P <
0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (
P <
0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (
P <
0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0–2‐h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12–24‐h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1).
Conclusion:
Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery. Background: The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Methods: Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 µg kg−1) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 µg kg−1). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was ≥ 4 (scale 0–10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented ≥ 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2–12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0–2‐h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12–24‐h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). Conclusion: Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery. The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol-anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 microg kg(-1)) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 microg kg(-1)). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was > or = 4 (scale 0-10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented > or = 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant. There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2-12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0-2-h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12-24-h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery. |
Author | Molíns, N. Bautista, A. P. Rey, T. Rama-Maceiras, P. Ferreira, T. A. Sanduende, Y. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: P. surname: Rama-Maceiras fullname: Rama-Maceiras, P. email: prmaceiras@wanadoo.es organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain – sequence: 2 givenname: T. A. surname: Ferreira fullname: Ferreira, T. A. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain – sequence: 3 givenname: N. surname: Molíns fullname: Molíns, N. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain – sequence: 4 givenname: Y. surname: Sanduende fullname: Sanduende, Y. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain – sequence: 5 givenname: A. P. surname: Bautista fullname: Bautista, A. P. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain – sequence: 6 givenname: T. surname: Rey fullname: Rey, T. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16864596$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkMFu1DAURS1URKeFX0DesEIJthPbscRmVGCKNAKJglhaL85L8ZBJIjsZZrZ8OQkZtSzxxrbePVdP54pctF2LhFDOUj6dN7uUZ8YkSmqVCsZkypiSLD0-IauHwQVZMcZ4IrkWl-Qqxt30zXJjnpFLLrUUmclW5PcWY6R9F4euxwCDPyBtYYwIFNqKHrq9H3x7T6EeMNA-dH1Xdw19TQPufY3tAK1v6AFDHOO_42V0aqYWwDj8wOiBVmOYu_oG4uAdjWO4x3B6Tp7W0ER8cb6vybcP77_e3Cbbz5uPN-tt4jKds8SYIjdKaA1QlbnijJUOipoXmRY1oOMSlEahlBPC5bwsRSFqyScfVVkoB9k1KZZeF7oYA9a2D34P4WQ5s7NWu7OzPTvbs7NW-1erPU7oywXtx3KP1SN49jgFXp0DEB00dYDW-fiYU4XKpVFT7u2S--UbPP33Ana9vpseE54suI8DHh9wCD-t0pmW9vunjX0nii9K3N3aTfYHbXWm2Q |
CODEN | AANEAB |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_bcpt_12223 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2006_01210_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_012_1468_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2013_02_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_peptides_2006_07_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00101_013_2234_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0289_07_41839_4 crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2015_56_2_529 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coms_2018_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0b013e3181ddaeb3 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0120_3347_10_81005_6 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000001385 crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2015_30_5_651 crossref_primary_10_4103_0019_5049_68375 crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2016_69_1_51 crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2007_53_5_609 crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185113519623 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_revsto_2014_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_07_70476_0 crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2008_54_3_283 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_017_0840_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2016_04_018 crossref_primary_10_1177_1179556519855387 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_022_05894_4 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_724753 crossref_primary_10_2199_jjsca_27_572 crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2008_49_2_204 crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_28533 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_16_80723_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_07_70307_9 crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2007_52_3_367 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2044_2007_05221_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_16_80792_6 crossref_primary_10_2344_15_00011_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2009_02115_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2010_02275_x crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_12788 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2019_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0034_9356_10_70711_8 crossref_primary_10_1213_01_ANE_0000219597_16143_4D crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2015_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aan_2009_07_002 |
Cites_doi | 10.1213/00000539-198509000-00009 10.1097/00008506-200001000-00004 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70243-9 10.1093/bja/77.4.463 10.1213/00000539-199609000-00038 10.1007/BF03015160 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00022 10.1097/00000539-199607000-00021 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00022 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002 10.1097/00000542-199809010-00034 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00017 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x 10.1213/00000539-199612000-00028 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00023 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2005 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | BSCLL IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00650.x |
DatabaseName | Istex Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1399-6576 |
EndPage | 311 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1111_j_1399_6576_2005_00650_x 15752393 16864596 AAS650 ark_67375_WNG_D28R62SH_G |
Genre | article Comparative Study Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 23M 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6P2 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUOVR AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM EAD EAP EBC EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M J5H K48 KBYEO L7B LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR X7M XG1 ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT 08R AAPBV AAUGY AAVGM ABHUG ABPTK ACXME ADAWD ADDAD AFVGU AGJLS IQODW ZA5 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3740-998496277aadb46100bca8f18372faec15a67e266c22c41bb282f51139db86ca3 |
IEDL.DBID | 33P |
ISSN | 0001-5172 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 23 02:48:12 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:49:42 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 22 16:05:47 EDT 2023 Sat Aug 24 00:58:26 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:57:42 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Postoperative Agonist Intravenous administration complications Intravenous anaesthesia μ Opioid receptor Fentanyl Opiates Plastic surgery Nausea Narcotic analgesic Remifentanil postoperative nausea and vomiting General anesthetic Vomiting Digestive diseases Anesthesia Complication Propofol Sedative Comparative study |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3740-998496277aadb46100bca8f18372faec15a67e266c22c41bb282f51139db86ca3 |
Notes | ArticleID:AAS650 istex:94FA46317EBAE5E520CCCED36764E5778DB8B0B7 ark:/67375/WNG-D28R62SH-G |
PMID | 15752393 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2005_00650_x pubmed_primary_15752393 pascalfrancis_primary_16864596 wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2005_00650_x_AAS650 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_D28R62SH_G |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2005 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2005 text: March 2005 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK; Malden, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK; Malden, USA – name: Oxford – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Acta Anaesthesiol Scand |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc Blackwell |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc – name: Blackwell |
References | Phitayakorn P, Melnick BM, Vicine AF 3rd. Comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl infusions for outpatient anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1987; 34: 242-5. Bekker AY, Berklayd P, Osborn I, Bloom M, Yarmush J, Turndorf H. The recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia is faster than after an isoflurane-nitrous oxide-fentanyl combination in elderly patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 117-22. Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 162-84. Flacke JW, Bloor BC, Kripke BJ et al. Comparison of morphine, meperidine, fentanyl and sufentanil in balanced anesthesia: a double blind study. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 897-910. Schüttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H et al. A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 307-17.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x Davis PJ, Finkel JC, Orr RJ et al. A randomised, doble-blind study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 863-71.DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00017 Coles JP, Leary TS, Moneiro JN et al. Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy. a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesth 2000; 12: 15-20. Bürkle H, Dunbar S, Van Aken H. Remifentanil: a novel, short-acting, µ-opioid. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 646-51. Jellish WS, Leonetti JP, Avramov A, Fluder E, Murdoch J. Remifentanil-based anesthesia versus a propofol technique for otologic surgical procedure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122: 222-7. Pueyo FJ, Carrascosa F, López L, Iribarren MJ, García-Pedrajas F, Saez A. Combination of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 117-22.DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199607000-00021 Michalowski P, Dershwitz M, Rosow CE, Conlay LA, Chang YC. Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil or alfentanil in ambulatory orthopedic surgery carries minimal risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1998; 89 (3A): A34.DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199809010-00034 Guy J, Hindman B, Baker K et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 514-24.DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002 Eltzschig HK, Schroeder TH, Eissler BJ et al. The effect of remifentanil or fentanyl on postoperative vomiting and pain in children undergoing strabismus surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1173-7.DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00022 Tramèr MR. A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 4-13.DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x Bowdle TA, Camporesi EM, Maysick L et al. A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1292-7. Ewalenko P, Janny S, Dejonckheere M, Andry G, Wyns C. Antiemetic effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol after thyroidectomy. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 463-7. 1987; 34 2000; 12 1997; 86 2002; 94 1997; 52 1996; 83 2000; 90 2000; 91 2000; 122 2001; 45 1992; 77 1985; 64 1998; 89 1996; 77 e_1_2_5_14_2 e_1_2_5_13_2 e_1_2_5_9_2 e_1_2_5_16_2 e_1_2_5_8_2 e_1_2_5_15_2 e_1_2_5_7_2 e_1_2_5_10_2 e_1_2_5_6_2 e_1_2_5_5_2 e_1_2_5_12_2 e_1_2_5_4_2 e_1_2_5_11_2 e_1_2_5_2_2 e_1_2_5_17_2 Bürkle H (e_1_2_5_3_2) 1996; 83 |
References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 4 year: 2001 end-page: 13 article-title: A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand – volume: 77 start-page: 463 year: 1996 end-page: 7 article-title: Antiemetic effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol after thyroidectomy publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 12 start-page: 15 year: 2000 end-page: 20 article-title: Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy. a double‐blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl publication-title: J Neurosurg Anesth – volume: 64 start-page: 897 year: 1985 end-page: 910 article-title: Comparison of morphine, meperidine, fentanyl and sufentanil in balanced anesthesia: a double blind study publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 83 start-page: 646 year: 1996 end-page: 51 article-title: Remifentanil: a novel, short‐acting, µ‐opioid publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 34 start-page: 242 year: 1987 end-page: 5 article-title: Comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl infusions for outpatient anaesthesia publication-title: Can J Anaesth – volume: 52 start-page: 307 year: 1997 end-page: 17 article-title: A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery publication-title: Anaesthesia – volume: 89 start-page: A34 issue: 3A year: 1998 article-title: Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil or alfentanil in ambulatory orthopedic surgery carries minimal risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 94 start-page: 1173 year: 2002 end-page: 7 article-title: The effect of remifentanil or fentanyl on postoperative vomiting and pain in children undergoing strabismus surgery publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 77 start-page: 162 year: 1992 end-page: 84 article-title: Postoperative nausea and vomiting publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 90 start-page: 863 year: 2000 end-page: 71 article-title: A randomised, doble‐blind study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 86 start-page: 514 year: 1997 end-page: 24 article-title: Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space‐occupying lesions publication-title: Anesthesiology – volume: 83 start-page: 1292 year: 1996 end-page: 7 article-title: A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 122 start-page: 222 year: 2000 end-page: 7 article-title: Remifentanil‐based anesthesia versus a propofol technique for otologic surgical procedure publication-title: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg – volume: 91 start-page: 117 year: 2000 end-page: 22 article-title: The recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil‐nitrous oxide anesthesia is faster than after an isoflurane‐nitrous oxide‐fentanyl combination in elderly patients publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 83 start-page: 117 year: 1996 end-page: 22 article-title: Combination of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting publication-title: Anesth Analg – ident: e_1_2_5_8_2 doi: 10.1213/00000539-198509000-00009 – ident: e_1_2_5_4_2 doi: 10.1097/00008506-200001000-00004 – ident: e_1_2_5_12_2 doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70243-9 – ident: e_1_2_5_16_2 doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.463 – volume: 83 start-page: 646 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_5_3_2 article-title: Remifentanil: a novel, short‐acting, µ‐opioid publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-199609000-00038 contributor: fullname: Bürkle H – ident: e_1_2_5_7_2 doi: 10.1007/BF03015160 – ident: e_1_2_5_15_2 doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00022 – ident: e_1_2_5_6_2 doi: 10.1097/00000539-199607000-00021 – ident: e_1_2_5_11_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x – ident: e_1_2_5_10_2 doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00022 – ident: e_1_2_5_5_2 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002 – ident: e_1_2_5_13_2 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809010-00034 – ident: e_1_2_5_14_2 doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00017 – ident: e_1_2_5_17_2 doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x – ident: e_1_2_5_9_2 doi: 10.1213/00000539-199612000-00028 – ident: e_1_2_5_2_2 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00023 |
SSID | ssj0003499 |
Score | 2.0310614 |
Snippet | Background: The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study... The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare... Background: The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study... |
SourceID | crossref pubmed pascalfrancis wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 305 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Androstanols - therapeutic use Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthetics, Combined - adverse effects Anesthetics, Combined - therapeutic use Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects Anesthetics, Intravenous - therapeutic use Antiemetics - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences complications Double-Blind Method Female fentanyl Fentanyl - adverse effects Fentanyl - therapeutic use Humans Intravenous anaesthesia Male Medical sciences Metoclopramide - therapeutic use Middle Aged Morphine - therapeutic use Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - therapeutic use Piperidines - adverse effects Piperidines - therapeutic use postoperative nausea and vomiting Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - prevention & control propofol Propofol - adverse effects Propofol - therapeutic use Prospective Studies Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods remifentanil |
Title | Less postoperative nausea and vomiting after propofol + remifentanil versus propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia during plastic surgery |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-D28R62SH-G/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2005.00650.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752393 |
Volume | 49 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA5aL1584Gt9lBzEi6xs991jsS9EilhFbyHZTbDYbpeuK_XqL3cmaWsLHkS8LYRssjOZzDfLzDeEnCted7jyPVv6wocAxXHsmGMViO4vAvFHJLAauduPes9xs4U0OTfzWhjDD7H44YaWoe9rNHAuilUjB-eKqRvh_NcIoI0rxJMQNOhqDu9ucSl7fn2GhGt2AE57NannxxeteKoNFPoUMyd5AcJTpuvFkttahrbaN7W3__OrdsjWDKHShjlSu2RNZnvk8xZuRJojC0cuDVk4zXgJdkJ5ltL38WiA-dNUtxynObZeUOMhvaQTORoozE_PBkOKKSBlsTxshj6G8BYO_ulFFgNOTekkzQHYwx5oYSq398lju_Vw3bVn7RvsxIt8x4ZAzsfWPhHnqUBad0ckPFZwh0Su4jKpBTyMJACExHUTvyYERH8K8J9XT0UcJtw7IJVsnMkjUFUsVeqKVIjEg4A0jSXEQTJRbgjoxAtCi9TmqmK5YelgS9ENSJShRLHnZsC0RNnUIhdap4sJfPKKWW5RwJ56HdZ04_vQ7XdZxyLVFaV_rxDGSMUDqx-aU_A9AiAYueUsEmhl_3pTrNHow8PxH-edkE1NLatz5E5J5W1SyjOyXqRlVZvDF1f0B7s |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,1408,27935,27936,46066,46490 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LTxsxELZ4HOBSqPog5VEfUC_Vos3a-8gxal6IEFVNENwse9cWEclmlSWIXvvLO2PnKXFAiNtKlr3emR3PN9bMN4ScG1nzpeHM01xxCFB830skVoHY_iIQf8QKq5E7_bh3lzSaSJNztaiFcfwQyws3tAx7XqOB44X0ppWDd8XcjWhxNwJw4wIA5S6PeA37ODD2e3ksM16bY-GqF4Lb3kzreXGlDV-1i2J_xtxJWYL4jOt7sea41sGt9U6tg3f9rkPyYQ5Sad39VR_Jls4_kX9dOBRpgUQchXZ84TSXMzAVKvOMPk3GQ0yhprbrOC2w-4KZjOhPOtXjocEU9Xw4opgFMivXh93Q3xGsIsFF3etyKKmrnqQFYHvYAy1d8fZnctNqDn51vHkHBy9lMfc9iOU4dveJpcwUMrv7KpWJgWMkDozUaTWUUawBI6RBkPKqUhAAGoCArJapJEol-0J28kmuj0BXiTZZoDKlUgYxaZZoCIV0aoIIAAoLowqpLnQlCkfUIdYCHJCoQIli281QWImK5wr5YZW6nCCnD5joFofittcWjSD5EwX9jmhXyNmG1ldviBJk44G3f3W_wWoEcDDSy1VIaLX96k2Jer0PD9_eOO872esMrruie9m7Oib7lmnWpsydkJ3H6Uyfku0ym51Z2_gP9RYL3A |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA5qQbz4wFd91BzEi6xs991jsbb1QRGr6C0kuwkW2-3StVKv_nJnkj7Bg4i3hZBNdiaT-WaZ-YaQU8UrNleea0lPeBCg2LYVcawC0f1FIP4IBVYjN9th6yWqXSFNzs2kFsbwQ0x_uKFl6PsaDTxL1KKRg3PF1I1g8msE0MYF4MmCh6gcyznc--mt7HqVMRQuWz547cWsnh_ftOCqCij1EaZO8hykp0zbizm_NY9ttXOqb_znZ22S9TFEpVVzprbIkky3ydcdXIk0QxqOTBq2cJryIRgK5WlCP_q9DiZQU91znGbYe0H1u_ScDmSvozBBPe10KeaADPP5YTP02YW3cHBQrzLvcGpqJ2kGyB72QHNTur1DnupXj5dNa9y_wYrd0LMtiOQ87O0Tcp4I5HW3RcwjBZdI6Cgu47LPg1ACQogdJ_bKQkD4pwAAupVEREHM3V2ykvZTuQ-qiqRKHJEIEbsQkSaRhEBIxsoJAJ64flAk5YmqWGZoOthceAMSZShRbLrpMy1RNiqSM63T6QQ-eMM0t9Bnz60GqznRQ-C0m6xRJKUFpc9WCCLk4oHV98wpmI0ACkZyuSLxtbJ_vSlWrbbh4eCP807I6n2tzu6uW7eHZE3TzOp8uSOy8j4YymOynCfDkraMb7cbCos |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Less+postoperative+nausea+and+vomiting+after+propofol+%2B+remifentanil+versus+propofol+%2B+fentanyl+anaesthesia+during+plastic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Acta+anaesthesiologica+Scandinavica&rft.au=Rama%E2%80%90Maceiras%2C+P.&rft.au=Ferreira%2C+T.+A.&rft.au=Mol%C3%ADns%2C+N.&rft.au=Sanduende%2C+Y.&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd%2FInc&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2005.00650.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1399-6576.2005.00650.x&rft.externalDocID=AAS650 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-5172&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-5172&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-5172&client=summon |