Less postoperative nausea and vomiting after propofol + remifentanil versus propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia during plastic surgery

Background:  The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 305 - 311
Main Authors: Rama-Maceiras, P., Ferreira, T. A., Molíns, N., Sanduende, Y., Bautista, A. P., Rey, T.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK; Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc 01-03-2005
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background:  The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Methods:  Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 µg kg−1) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 µg kg−1). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was ≥ 4 (scale 0–10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented ≥ 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results:  There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2–12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0–2‐h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12–24‐h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). Conclusion:  Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery.
AbstractList Background:  The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Methods:  Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 µg kg −1 ) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 µg kg −1 ). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was ≥ 4 (scale 0–10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented ≥ 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P  < 0.05 was considered significant. Results:  There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2–12 h postoperative hours' interval; ( P <  0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period ( P <  0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; ( P <  0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0–2‐h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12–24‐h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). Conclusion:  Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery.
Background:  The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol‐anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Methods:  Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 µg kg−1) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 µg kg−1). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was ≥ 4 (scale 0–10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented ≥ 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results:  There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2–12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0–2‐h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12–24‐h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). Conclusion:  Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery.
The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol-anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 microg kg(-1)) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 microg kg(-1)). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was > or = 4 (scale 0-10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented > or = 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant. There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2-12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0-2-h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12-24-h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery.
Author Molíns, N.
Bautista, A. P.
Rey, T.
Rama-Maceiras, P.
Ferreira, T. A.
Sanduende, Y.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: P.
  surname: Rama-Maceiras
  fullname: Rama-Maceiras, P.
  email: prmaceiras@wanadoo.es
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
– sequence: 2
  givenname: T. A.
  surname: Ferreira
  fullname: Ferreira, T. A.
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
– sequence: 3
  givenname: N.
  surname: Molíns
  fullname: Molíns, N.
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Y.
  surname: Sanduende
  fullname: Sanduende, Y.
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
– sequence: 5
  givenname: A. P.
  surname: Bautista
  fullname: Bautista, A. P.
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
– sequence: 6
  givenname: T.
  surname: Rey
  fullname: Rey, T.
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16864596$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkMFu1DAURS1URKeFX0DesEIJthPbscRmVGCKNAKJglhaL85L8ZBJIjsZZrZ8OQkZtSzxxrbePVdP54pctF2LhFDOUj6dN7uUZ8YkSmqVCsZkypiSLD0-IauHwQVZMcZ4IrkWl-Qqxt30zXJjnpFLLrUUmclW5PcWY6R9F4euxwCDPyBtYYwIFNqKHrq9H3x7T6EeMNA-dH1Xdw19TQPufY3tAK1v6AFDHOO_42V0aqYWwDj8wOiBVmOYu_oG4uAdjWO4x3B6Tp7W0ER8cb6vybcP77_e3Cbbz5uPN-tt4jKds8SYIjdKaA1QlbnijJUOipoXmRY1oOMSlEahlBPC5bwsRSFqyScfVVkoB9k1KZZeF7oYA9a2D34P4WQ5s7NWu7OzPTvbs7NW-1erPU7oywXtx3KP1SN49jgFXp0DEB00dYDW-fiYU4XKpVFT7u2S--UbPP33Ana9vpseE54suI8DHh9wCD-t0pmW9vunjX0nii9K3N3aTfYHbXWm2Q
CODEN AANEAB
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_bcpt_12223
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2006_01210_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_012_1468_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_redar_2013_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_peptides_2006_07_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00101_013_2234_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0289_07_41839_4
crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2015_56_2_529
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coms_2018_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0b013e3181ddaeb3
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0120_3347_10_81005_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000001385
crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2015_30_5_651
crossref_primary_10_4103_0019_5049_68375
crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2016_69_1_51
crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2007_53_5_609
crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185113519623
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_revsto_2014_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_07_70476_0
crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2008_54_3_283
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_017_0840_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2016_04_018
crossref_primary_10_1177_1179556519855387
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_022_05894_4
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_724753
crossref_primary_10_2199_jjsca_27_572
crossref_primary_10_3349_ymj_2008_49_2_204
crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_28533
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_16_80723_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_07_70307_9
crossref_primary_10_4097_kjae_2007_52_3_367
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2044_2007_05221_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_16_80792_6
crossref_primary_10_2344_15_00011_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2009_02115_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2010_02275_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_12788
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2019_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0034_9356_10_70711_8
crossref_primary_10_1213_01_ANE_0000219597_16143_4D
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2015_08_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aan_2009_07_002
Cites_doi 10.1213/00000539-198509000-00009
10.1097/00008506-200001000-00004
10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70243-9
10.1093/bja/77.4.463
10.1213/00000539-199609000-00038
10.1007/BF03015160
10.1097/00000539-200205000-00022
10.1097/00000539-199607000-00021
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x
10.1097/00000539-200007000-00022
10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002
10.1097/00000542-199809010-00034
10.1097/00000539-200004000-00017
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x
10.1213/00000539-199612000-00028
10.1097/00000542-199207000-00023
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
DBID BSCLL
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00650.x
DatabaseName Istex
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1399-6576
EndPage 311
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_j_1399_6576_2005_00650_x
15752393
16864596
AAS650
ark_67375_WNG_D28R62SH_G
Genre article
Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
23M
31~
33P
36B
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6P2
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQQT
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUOVR
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
J5H
K48
KBYEO
L7B
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
08R
AAPBV
AAUGY
AAVGM
ABHUG
ABPTK
ACXME
ADAWD
ADDAD
AFVGU
AGJLS
IQODW
ZA5
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3740-998496277aadb46100bca8f18372faec15a67e266c22c41bb282f51139db86ca3
IEDL.DBID 33P
ISSN 0001-5172
IngestDate Fri Aug 23 02:48:12 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:49:42 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:05:47 EDT 2023
Sat Aug 24 00:58:26 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 09:57:42 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Postoperative
Agonist
Intravenous administration
complications
Intravenous anaesthesia
μ Opioid receptor
Fentanyl
Opiates
Plastic surgery
Nausea
Narcotic analgesic
Remifentanil
postoperative nausea and vomiting
General anesthetic
Vomiting
Digestive diseases
Anesthesia
Complication
Propofol
Sedative
Comparative study
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3740-998496277aadb46100bca8f18372faec15a67e266c22c41bb282f51139db86ca3
Notes ArticleID:AAS650
istex:94FA46317EBAE5E520CCCED36764E5778DB8B0B7
ark:/67375/WNG-D28R62SH-G
PMID 15752393
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2005_00650_x
pubmed_primary_15752393
pascalfrancis_primary_16864596
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2005_00650_x_AAS650
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_D28R62SH_G
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate March 2005
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2005
  text: March 2005
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK; Malden, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK; Malden, USA
– name: Oxford
– name: England
PublicationTitle Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
PublicationTitleAlternate Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc
Blackwell
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc
– name: Blackwell
References Phitayakorn P, Melnick BM, Vicine AF 3rd. Comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl infusions for outpatient anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1987; 34: 242-5.
Bekker AY, Berklayd P, Osborn I, Bloom M, Yarmush J, Turndorf H. The recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia is faster than after an isoflurane-nitrous oxide-fentanyl combination in elderly patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 117-22.
Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 162-84.
Flacke JW, Bloor BC, Kripke BJ et al. Comparison of morphine, meperidine, fentanyl and sufentanil in balanced anesthesia: a double blind study. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 897-910.
Schüttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H et al. A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 307-17.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x
Davis PJ, Finkel JC, Orr RJ et al. A randomised, doble-blind study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 863-71.DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00017
Coles JP, Leary TS, Moneiro JN et al. Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy. a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesth 2000; 12: 15-20.
Bürkle H, Dunbar S, Van Aken H. Remifentanil: a novel, short-acting, µ-opioid. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 646-51.
Jellish WS, Leonetti JP, Avramov A, Fluder E, Murdoch J. Remifentanil-based anesthesia versus a propofol technique for otologic surgical procedure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122: 222-7.
Pueyo FJ, Carrascosa F, López L, Iribarren MJ, García-Pedrajas F, Saez A. Combination of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 117-22.DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199607000-00021
Michalowski P, Dershwitz M, Rosow CE, Conlay LA, Chang YC. Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil or alfentanil in ambulatory orthopedic surgery carries minimal risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1998; 89 (3A): A34.DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199809010-00034
Guy J, Hindman B, Baker K et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 514-24.DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002
Eltzschig HK, Schroeder TH, Eissler BJ et al. The effect of remifentanil or fentanyl on postoperative vomiting and pain in children undergoing strabismus surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1173-7.DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00022
Tramèr MR. A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 4-13.DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x
Bowdle TA, Camporesi EM, Maysick L et al. A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1292-7.
Ewalenko P, Janny S, Dejonckheere M, Andry G, Wyns C. Antiemetic effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol after thyroidectomy. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 463-7.
1987; 34
2000; 12
1997; 86
2002; 94
1997; 52
1996; 83
2000; 90
2000; 91
2000; 122
2001; 45
1992; 77
1985; 64
1998; 89
1996; 77
e_1_2_5_14_2
e_1_2_5_13_2
e_1_2_5_9_2
e_1_2_5_16_2
e_1_2_5_8_2
e_1_2_5_15_2
e_1_2_5_7_2
e_1_2_5_10_2
e_1_2_5_6_2
e_1_2_5_5_2
e_1_2_5_12_2
e_1_2_5_4_2
e_1_2_5_11_2
e_1_2_5_2_2
e_1_2_5_17_2
Bürkle H (e_1_2_5_3_2) 1996; 83
References_xml – volume: 45
  start-page: 4
  year: 2001
  end-page: 13
  article-title: A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
– volume: 77
  start-page: 463
  year: 1996
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Antiemetic effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol after thyroidectomy
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 12
  start-page: 15
  year: 2000
  end-page: 20
  article-title: Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy. a double‐blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl
  publication-title: J Neurosurg Anesth
– volume: 64
  start-page: 897
  year: 1985
  end-page: 910
  article-title: Comparison of morphine, meperidine, fentanyl and sufentanil in balanced anesthesia: a double blind study
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 83
  start-page: 646
  year: 1996
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Remifentanil: a novel, short‐acting, µ‐opioid
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 34
  start-page: 242
  year: 1987
  end-page: 5
  article-title: Comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl infusions for outpatient anaesthesia
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
– volume: 52
  start-page: 307
  year: 1997
  end-page: 17
  article-title: A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
– volume: 89
  start-page: A34
  issue: 3A
  year: 1998
  article-title: Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil or alfentanil in ambulatory orthopedic surgery carries minimal risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
– volume: 94
  start-page: 1173
  year: 2002
  end-page: 7
  article-title: The effect of remifentanil or fentanyl on postoperative vomiting and pain in children undergoing strabismus surgery
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 77
  start-page: 162
  year: 1992
  end-page: 84
  article-title: Postoperative nausea and vomiting
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
– volume: 90
  start-page: 863
  year: 2000
  end-page: 71
  article-title: A randomised, doble‐blind study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 86
  start-page: 514
  year: 1997
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space‐occupying lesions
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
– volume: 83
  start-page: 1292
  year: 1996
  end-page: 7
  article-title: A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 122
  start-page: 222
  year: 2000
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Remifentanil‐based anesthesia versus a propofol technique for otologic surgical procedure
  publication-title: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
– volume: 91
  start-page: 117
  year: 2000
  end-page: 22
  article-title: The recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil‐nitrous oxide anesthesia is faster than after an isoflurane‐nitrous oxide‐fentanyl combination in elderly patients
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 83
  start-page: 117
  year: 1996
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Combination of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– ident: e_1_2_5_8_2
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-198509000-00009
– ident: e_1_2_5_4_2
  doi: 10.1097/00008506-200001000-00004
– ident: e_1_2_5_12_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70243-9
– ident: e_1_2_5_16_2
  doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.463
– volume: 83
  start-page: 646
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_5_3_2
  article-title: Remifentanil: a novel, short‐acting, µ‐opioid
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199609000-00038
  contributor:
    fullname: Bürkle H
– ident: e_1_2_5_7_2
  doi: 10.1007/BF03015160
– ident: e_1_2_5_15_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00022
– ident: e_1_2_5_6_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000539-199607000-00021
– ident: e_1_2_5_11_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.24-az0051.x
– ident: e_1_2_5_10_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00022
– ident: e_1_2_5_5_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002
– ident: e_1_2_5_13_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809010-00034
– ident: e_1_2_5_14_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00017
– ident: e_1_2_5_17_2
  doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450102.x
– ident: e_1_2_5_9_2
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199612000-00028
– ident: e_1_2_5_2_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00023
SSID ssj0003499
Score 2.0310614
Snippet Background:  The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study...
The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare...
Background:  The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study...
SourceID crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 305
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Androstanols - therapeutic use
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics, Combined - adverse effects
Anesthetics, Combined - therapeutic use
Anesthetics, Intravenous - adverse effects
Anesthetics, Intravenous - therapeutic use
Antiemetics - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
complications
Double-Blind Method
Female
fentanyl
Fentanyl - adverse effects
Fentanyl - therapeutic use
Humans
Intravenous anaesthesia
Male
Medical sciences
Metoclopramide - therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Morphine - therapeutic use
Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - therapeutic use
Piperidines - adverse effects
Piperidines - therapeutic use
postoperative nausea and vomiting
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - prevention & control
propofol
Propofol - adverse effects
Propofol - therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
remifentanil
Title Less postoperative nausea and vomiting after propofol + remifentanil versus propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia during plastic surgery
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-D28R62SH-G/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2005.00650.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752393
Volume 49
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA5aL1584Gt9lBzEi6xs991jsS9EilhFbyHZTbDYbpeuK_XqL3cmaWsLHkS8LYRssjOZzDfLzDeEnCted7jyPVv6wocAxXHsmGMViO4vAvFHJLAauduPes9xs4U0OTfzWhjDD7H44YaWoe9rNHAuilUjB-eKqRvh_NcIoI0rxJMQNOhqDu9ucSl7fn2GhGt2AE57NannxxeteKoNFPoUMyd5AcJTpuvFkttahrbaN7W3__OrdsjWDKHShjlSu2RNZnvk8xZuRJojC0cuDVk4zXgJdkJ5ltL38WiA-dNUtxynObZeUOMhvaQTORoozE_PBkOKKSBlsTxshj6G8BYO_ulFFgNOTekkzQHYwx5oYSq398lju_Vw3bVn7RvsxIt8x4ZAzsfWPhHnqUBad0ckPFZwh0Su4jKpBTyMJACExHUTvyYERH8K8J9XT0UcJtw7IJVsnMkjUFUsVeqKVIjEg4A0jSXEQTJRbgjoxAtCi9TmqmK5YelgS9ENSJShRLHnZsC0RNnUIhdap4sJfPKKWW5RwJ56HdZ04_vQ7XdZxyLVFaV_rxDGSMUDqx-aU_A9AiAYueUsEmhl_3pTrNHow8PxH-edkE1NLatz5E5J5W1SyjOyXqRlVZvDF1f0B7s
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,1408,27935,27936,46066,46490
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LTxsxELZ4HOBSqPog5VEfUC_Vos3a-8gxal6IEFVNENwse9cWEclmlSWIXvvLO2PnKXFAiNtKlr3emR3PN9bMN4ScG1nzpeHM01xxCFB830skVoHY_iIQf8QKq5E7_bh3lzSaSJNztaiFcfwQyws3tAx7XqOB44X0ppWDd8XcjWhxNwJw4wIA5S6PeA37ODD2e3ksM16bY-GqF4Lb3kzreXGlDV-1i2J_xtxJWYL4jOt7sea41sGt9U6tg3f9rkPyYQ5Sad39VR_Jls4_kX9dOBRpgUQchXZ84TSXMzAVKvOMPk3GQ0yhprbrOC2w-4KZjOhPOtXjocEU9Xw4opgFMivXh93Q3xGsIsFF3etyKKmrnqQFYHvYAy1d8fZnctNqDn51vHkHBy9lMfc9iOU4dveJpcwUMrv7KpWJgWMkDozUaTWUUawBI6RBkPKqUhAAGoCArJapJEol-0J28kmuj0BXiTZZoDKlUgYxaZZoCIV0aoIIAAoLowqpLnQlCkfUIdYCHJCoQIli281QWImK5wr5YZW6nCCnD5joFofittcWjSD5EwX9jmhXyNmG1ldviBJk44G3f3W_wWoEcDDSy1VIaLX96k2Jer0PD9_eOO872esMrruie9m7Oib7lmnWpsydkJ3H6Uyfku0ym51Z2_gP9RYL3A
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA5qQbz4wFd91BzEi6xs991jsbb1QRGr6C0kuwkW2-3StVKv_nJnkj7Bg4i3hZBNdiaT-WaZ-YaQU8UrNleea0lPeBCg2LYVcawC0f1FIP4IBVYjN9th6yWqXSFNzs2kFsbwQ0x_uKFl6PsaDTxL1KKRg3PF1I1g8msE0MYF4MmCh6gcyznc--mt7HqVMRQuWz547cWsnh_ftOCqCij1EaZO8hykp0zbizm_NY9ttXOqb_znZ22S9TFEpVVzprbIkky3ydcdXIk0QxqOTBq2cJryIRgK5WlCP_q9DiZQU91znGbYe0H1u_ScDmSvozBBPe10KeaADPP5YTP02YW3cHBQrzLvcGpqJ2kGyB72QHNTur1DnupXj5dNa9y_wYrd0LMtiOQ87O0Tcp4I5HW3RcwjBZdI6Cgu47LPg1ACQogdJ_bKQkD4pwAAupVEREHM3V2ykvZTuQ-qiqRKHJEIEbsQkSaRhEBIxsoJAJ64flAk5YmqWGZoOthceAMSZShRbLrpMy1RNiqSM63T6QQ-eMM0t9Bnz60GqznRQ-C0m6xRJKUFpc9WCCLk4oHV98wpmI0ACkZyuSLxtbJ_vSlWrbbh4eCP807I6n2tzu6uW7eHZE3TzOp8uSOy8j4YymOynCfDkraMb7cbCos
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Less+postoperative+nausea+and+vomiting+after+propofol+%2B+remifentanil+versus+propofol+%2B+fentanyl+anaesthesia+during+plastic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Acta+anaesthesiologica+Scandinavica&rft.au=Rama%E2%80%90Maceiras%2C+P.&rft.au=Ferreira%2C+T.+A.&rft.au=Mol%C3%ADns%2C+N.&rft.au=Sanduende%2C+Y.&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd%2FInc&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2005.00650.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1399-6576.2005.00650.x&rft.externalDocID=AAS650
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-5172&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-5172&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-5172&client=summon