On Elkan's theorems: Clarifying their meaning via simple proofs

This article deals with the claims that “a standard version of fuzzy logic collapses mathematically to two‐valued logic” made by Charles Elkan in two papers [Proc 11th National Conf on AI, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1993, pp 698–703; IEEE Expert 1994;9:3–8]. Although Elkan's effort to triviali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of intelligent systems Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 203 - 207
Main Authors: Bělohlávek, Radim, Klir, George J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-02-2007
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article deals with the claims that “a standard version of fuzzy logic collapses mathematically to two‐valued logic” made by Charles Elkan in two papers [Proc 11th National Conf on AI, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1993, pp 698–703; IEEE Expert 1994;9:3–8]. Although Elkan's effort to trivialize fuzzy logic has been questioned by numerous authors, our aim is to examine in detail his formal arguments and make some new observations. We present alternative, considerably simpler proofs of Elkan's theorems and use these proofs to argue that Elkan's claims are unwarranted. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Int Syst 22: 203–207, 2007.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-NJD3QQS9-2
ArticleID:INT20194
istex:E90BBBF07AE139C5133889C555EF4DD3A13E53F1
MSM - No. 6198959214
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0884-8173
1098-111X
DOI:10.1002/int.20194