Are Fit Indices Biased in Favor of Bi-Factor Models in Cognitive Ability Research?: A Comparison of Fit in Correlated Factors, Higher-Order, and Bi-Factor Models via Monte Carlo Simulations

• Published in: Journal of intelligence Vol. 3; no. 1; pp. 2 - 20
• Main Authors: Morgan, Grant, Hodge, Kari, Wells, Kevin, Watkins, Marley
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-03-2015
• Subjects: bi-factor model; Cognition & reasoning; confirmatory factor analysis; Intelligence; Monte Carlo simulation
• ISSN: 2079-3200; 2079-3200
• DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence3010002

Bi-factor confirmatory factor models have been influential in research on cognitive abilities because they often better fit the data than correlated factors and higher-order models. They also instantiate a perspective that differs from that offered by other models. Motivated by previous work that hypothesized an inherent statistical bias of fit indices favoring the bi-factor model, we compared the fit of correlated factors, higher-order, and bi-factor models via Monte Carlo methods. When data were sampled from a true bi-factor structure, each of the approximate fit indices was more likely than not to identify the bi-factor solution as the best fitting. When samples were selected from a true multiple correlated factors structure, approximate fit indices were more likely overall to identify the correlated factors solution as the best fitting. In contrast, when samples were generated from a true higher-order structure, approximate fit indices tended to identify the bi-factor solution as best fitting. There was extensive overlap of fit values across the models regardless of true structure. Although one model may fit a given dataset best relative to the other models, each of the models tended to fit the data well in absolute terms. Given this variability, models must also be judged on substantive and conceptual grounds.