Direct seeding of late-successional trees to restore tropical montane forest

• Published in: Forest ecology and management Vol. 261; no. 10; pp. 1590 - 1597
• Main Authors: Cole, R.J., Holl, K.D., Keene, C.L., Zahawi, R.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15-05-2011
• Subjects: Biomass allocation; Direct seeding; Enrichment; Enrichment planting; Forest succession; Forests; Montane forest; Nucleation; Plantations; Planting; Restoration; Survival; Trees; Tropical forest restoration; Costa Rica; Montane forest; Direct seeding; Biomass allocation; Enrichment planting; Tropical forest restoration; Forest succession
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038

▶ Recruitment of large-seeded tropical trees is limited by lack of seed dispersal. ▶ Direct seeding increased recruitment under pastures, secondary forests, and plantations. ▶ Seedling survival and growth was highest under fast-growing N-fixing trees. ▶ Direct seeding is a low-cost restoration approach for degraded tropical lands.
Natural regeneration of large-seeded, late-successional trees in fragmented tropical landscapes can be strongly limited by a lack of seed dispersal resulting in the need for more intensive restoration approaches, such as enrichment planting, to include these species in future forests. Direct seeding may be an alternative low-cost approach to planting nursery-raised tree seedlings, but there is minimal information on its efficacy or when in the successional process this technique will be most successful. We tested directly seeding five native tree species into habitats representing passive and active restoration approaches: (1) recently abandoned pasture; (2) naturally establishing, young secondary forests; and (3) young, mixed-species (fast-growing N-fixers and commercially valuable species) tree plantations established to facilitate montane forest recovery in southern Costa Rica. We monitored germination, survival, growth, and above- and below-ground biomass over a 2-year period. Germination in pastures, secondary forests, and tree plantations was similar (∼43%). Seedling survival after one and two years was significantly higher under tree plantations (91% year 1, 75% year 2) compared to secondary forests (76, 44%) or pastures (74, 41%). Moreover, seedlings had greater total biomass and lower root:shoot ratios in the plantations, suggesting higher nutrient availability in that treatment. Costs for direct seeding were 10- to 30-fold less per 100 seedlings after 2-year compared to nursery-raised seedlings planted at the same sites; however, there are important trade-offs to the two restoration approaches. Planting nursery-raised seedling is a more effective but higher cost approach for rapidly establishing canopy cover and restoring large areas whereas direct seeding is a more efficient way to enrich an existing system. We particularly recommend using direct seeding as a complimentary measure to the more intensive restoration approach of planting fast-growing and N-fixing trees.