Flux trap effect study in a sub-critical neutron assembly using activation methods

• Published in: Radiation effects and defects in solids Vol. 171; no. 9-10; pp. 746 - 753
• Main Authors: Routsonis, K., Stoulos, S., Clouvas, A., Catsaros, N., Varvayianni, M., Manolopoulou, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis 01-09-2016; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Activation; activation detectors; Assembly; Flux; Heat transfer; Heat transmission; Neutron flux; neutron flux trap; Neutron sources; Neutrons; Nuclear fuel elements; Nuclear physics; Subcritical assembly
• ISSN: 1042-0150; 1029-4953
• DOI: 10.1080/10420150.2016.1257620

The neutron flux trap effect was experimentally studied in the subcritical assembly of the Atomic and Nuclear Physics Laboratory of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, using delayed gamma neutron activation analysis. Measurements were taken within the natural uranium fuel grid, in vertical levels symmetrical to the Am-Be neutron source, before and after the removal of fuel elements, permitting likewise a basic study of the vertical flux profile. Three identical flux traps of diamond shape were created by removing four fuel rods for each one. Two (n, γ) reactions and one (n, p) threshold reaction were selected for thermal, epithermal and fast flux study. Results of thermal and epithermal flux obtained through the
197
Au (n, γ)
198
Au and
186
W (n, γ)
187
W reactions, with and without Cd covers, to differentiate between the two flux regions. The
58
Ni (n, p)
58
Co reaction was used for the fast flux determination. An interpolation technique based on local procedures was applied to fit the cross sections data and the neutron flux spectrum. End results show a maximum thermal flux increase of 105% at the source level, pointing to a high potential to increase in the available thermal flux for future experiments. The increase in thermal flux is not accompanied by a comparable decrease in epithermal or fast flux, since thermal flux gain is higher than epithermal and fast neutron flux loss. So, the neutron reflection is mainly responsible for the thermal neutron increase, contributing to 89% at the central axial position.