A survey of exercise testing practice in Scottish hospitals

• Published in: Scottish medical journal Vol. 38; no. 2; p. 45
• Main Authors: Muir, K W, Rodger, J C, DeBono, J S, McDonald, H, Irving, J B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland 01-04-1993
• Subjects: Exercise Test - statistics & numerical data; Exercise Test - utilization; Hospitals, District - statistics & numerical data; Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data; Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia - diagnosis; Myocardial Ischemia - rehabilitation; Scotland; Surveys and Questionnaires; Utilization Review; Scotland
• ISSN: 0036-9330
• DOI: 10.1177/003693309303800204

A 1989 survey (unpublished) of exercise testing practice in Scotland suggested that there were important differences in the practice of exercise testing between hospitals. A postal questionnaire was sent to 30 teaching and district general hospitals in 1991 and followed up by telephone questioning of consultants. The numbers of exercise tests performed had increased to 22,012 in 1990, and a greater proportion were performed in district general hospitals. General practitioners had very limited access to the service but hospital doctors of any grade had almost free access. Rationing of early post myocardial infarction testing led to attempts to define "high risk" post infarction patients and this included inappropriate patients in many hospitals. A variety of different protocols was used. Eighteen out of 30 hospitals surveyed discontinued beta blockers but only four hospitals took account of antianginal, antihypertensive or other medication, and all but one exercised patients while on digoxin. In the majority of hospitals decisions regarding drug therapy were taken by individual physicians. A variety of personnel reported tests, many without specialist training in cardiology. Even among consultants there was no concerns on the degree of ST depression which was significant. Exercise tests performed in different hospitals in Scotland are not comparable due to the wide variation in patient selection, test conditions, and interpretation of tests. This problem is likely to be exacerbated by the multiple personnel involved in all aspects of testing. It seems probable that there is a problem throughout the United Kingdom, and that there is a need for guidelines.