Lack of Clinical Usefulness of Das-1 Monoclonal Antibody and Mucin Expression as Risk Markers of Gastric Carcinoma in Patients With Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia

Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the monoclonal antibody Das-1 as a premalignant marker of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) associated with gastric cancer and its association with mucin expression. We evaluated Das-1 and mucin expression in 4 groups: 1 (n = 50), gastric carcinoma, paired...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of clinical pathology Vol. 131; no. 1; pp. 99 - 105
Main Authors: FORNE, Montserrat, FERNANCLEZ-BANARES, Fernanda, SALAS, Antonio, VIVER, Josep M, GONZALEZ-MINGUEZ, Clarisa, CASALOTS, Jaume, POBLET-MAS, Nuria, GARCIA-GIL, L. Jesus, ESTEVE, Maria, ROSINACH, Mercè, ESPINOS, Jorge, LORAS, Carme
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chicago, IL American Society of Clinical Pathologists 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the monoclonal antibody Das-1 as a premalignant marker of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) associated with gastric cancer and its association with mucin expression. We evaluated Das-1 and mucin expression in 4 groups: 1 (n = 50), gastric carcinoma, paired samples of the cancer area and GIM away from the tumor; 2 (n = 25), gastric or duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection with GIM and chronic gastritis; 3 (n = 25),H pylori- autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis with GIM; and 4 (n = 25),H pylori- chronic gastritis without GIM. Das-1 immunostaining was observed in 20 (40%) of 50 cases in cancer areas. The expression of Das-1 in GIM from group 1 cases away from the cancer area was different from that in GIM from nontumor cases (groups 2 and 3): 13 (26%) of 50 vs 2 (8%) and 0 (0%) of 25 (P = .004). There was no association between Das-1 and mucin expression. Das-1 expression was associated with GIM from patients with gastric cancer. However, this relation was weaker than previously reported, precluding clinical usefulness as a premalignant marker of GIM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9173
1943-7722
DOI:10.1309/AJCPNP7BK3KUUOJL