Performance theory based outcome measurement in engineering education and training

An approach is presented to improve engineering education that is based on new concepts of systems performance and classic feedback theory. An important aspect is the use of general systems performance theory (GSPT) to provide a performance model of the educational system and as a basis for the key...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on education Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 92 - 99
Main Authors: Dillon, W.E., Kondraske, G.V., Everett, L.J., Volz, R.A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York IEEE 01-05-2000
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An approach is presented to improve engineering education that is based on new concepts of systems performance and classic feedback theory. An important aspect is the use of general systems performance theory (GSPT) to provide a performance model of the educational system and as a basis for the key outcome metrics: the volumes of performance capacity envelopes of individual students. Feedback is aimed at achieving both better curriculum design and teaching methods. In addition to conceptual issues, a web-based implementation plan and experimental validation plan is described. The quantitative modeling approach taken, including choice of appropriate levels of abstraction, has provided better understanding of the system used to provide engineering education and a basis for quantitatively linking components of the program to student performance in a causal manner. The educational system performance model is discussed in the context of competency models. It is believed that this approach holds promise for not only documenting a meaningful type of outcome but also for providing insight into the rationale for steps taken in attempts to improve an educational system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0018-9359
1557-9638
DOI:10.1109/13.848059