Effects of Timolol and Betaxolol on Choroidal Blood Flow in the Rabbit

This study evaluated the effects of the topical β1-adrenergic antagonist betaxolol and the non-selective β-adrenergic antagonist timolol on the choroidal pressure–flow relationship. Pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits were instrumented with hydraulic occluders on the aorta and inferior vena cava to c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental eye research Vol. 67; no. 5; pp. 501 - 507
Main Authors: KIEL, J.W., PATEL, P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Elsevier Ltd 01-11-1998
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study evaluated the effects of the topical β1-adrenergic antagonist betaxolol and the non-selective β-adrenergic antagonist timolol on the choroidal pressure–flow relationship. Pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits were instrumented with hydraulic occluders on the aorta and inferior vena cava to control MAP, an ear artery cannula to measure mean arterial pressure (MAP), and two vitreous cannulas to control and measure intraocular pressure (IOP). Choroidal blood flow was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry with the fiber-optic probe tip positioned over the posterior pole. Choroidal pressure–flow curves were obtained before and 30 min after topical application of 0.1 ml of betaxolol (Betoptic, 0.5%,n=10), timolol (Timoptic, 0.5%,n=10) or saline (n=8) by varying the MAP without controlling the IOP and by raising IOP while holding the MAP constant at 70 mmHg. The IOP was significantly reduced by betaxolol and timolol but not by saline. MAP was also slightly, but significantly, reduced after betaxolol but not after timolol or saline. However, the systemic hypotensive response to isoproterenol (8 μg/kg, i.v.) was blunted after betaxolol and timolol indicating appreciable systemic absorption of both drugs. Timolol, but not betaxolol or saline, caused a significant, small increase in baseline choroidal vascular resistance. Timolol also attenuated the IOP response to MAP; however, none of the treatments had a significant effect on the choroidal pressure–flow relationship. We conclude that both drugs reach the systemic circulation after topical application, but neither betaxolol nor timolol alter the choroidal response to acute changes in perfusion pressure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0014-4835
1096-0007
DOI:10.1006/exer.1998.0553