A case series of biting dogs: characteristics of the dogs, their behaviour, and their victims

The characteristics of 227 biting dogs, their homes, and their victims were gathered in a detailed telephone survey of general veterinary clientele in the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island. All of the dogs had bitten either someone living in the same househol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied animal behaviour science Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 43 - 57
Main Authors: Guy, N.C, Luescher, U.A, Dohoo, S.E, Spangler, E, Miller, J.B, Dohoo, I.R, Bate, L.A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 11-09-2001
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The characteristics of 227 biting dogs, their homes, and their victims were gathered in a detailed telephone survey of general veterinary clientele in the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island. All of the dogs had bitten either someone living in the same household, or someone who was a frequent visitor and was well known to the dog. There were 117 male and 110 female dogs included in this case series. Significantly more female dogs were neutered ( P=0.03), 58% of the dogs were purebred, and the most commonly reported breed was the Labrador Retriever ( n=15). The mean number of people living in each home was 3.13 (S.D.±0.08). Aggression which would traditionally be defined as dominant or possessive had been demonstrated by 75.6% of the dogs in at least one of 17 specific situations outlined in the questionnaire. Dogs with a history of this type of aggression were significantly older ( P=0.02) and of lower body weight ( P<0.001) when compared to the remainder of the dogs, and were more likely to be fearful of a variety of stimuli. The effect of fear in these dogs may be important in understanding the motivation for and treatment of aggression problems. For what the owner considered to be the worst bite incident, 42.4% could be attributed to behaviour which appeared to be characteristic of dominant or possessive aggression. If the reason for the worst bite incident was related to the commonly accepted criteria for dominance aggression, then the dogs were more often male and purebred. Owners of these dogs were also more likely to rank the bite as a more serious event ( P=0.001). Adults were the most common victims of dog bites, and most injuries were to the hands and arms (56.2%). A minority of injuries (9.3%) received medical attention, supporting previous evidence that dog bites are greatly underreported. A bite requiring medical attention was scored as a more important incident by the owner and was more likely to have caused the owner to take precautions to prevent further injuries. Although the presence of aggression related to dominance was not associated with gender or breed, the severity of this form of aggression and its importance to the owner were greater for male and purebred dogs. These factors may explain the characteristics of dogs as they are reported by behaviour specialists working in a referral setting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-1591
1872-9045
DOI:10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00155-1