Evaluation of engraftment syndrome in children following full-matched related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantations

The term “ES” has been widely used for describing a clinical condition consisting of skin rash, fever, and weight gain that occur during neutrophil recovery period following HSCT. In this study, the incidence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of ES were evaluated in 169 children followi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric transplantation Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 581 - 589
Main Authors: İleri, Talia, Ünal İnce, Elif, Çakmaklı, Hasan, Uysal, Zümrüt, Gençtürk, Zeynep, Ertem, Mehmet
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The term “ES” has been widely used for describing a clinical condition consisting of skin rash, fever, and weight gain that occur during neutrophil recovery period following HSCT. In this study, the incidence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of ES were evaluated in 169 children following allogeneic HSCT from full‐matched related donor according to the Spitzer criteria. Seventeen patients (10.1%) presented with clinical conditions suggesting ES. In both univariate and multivariate analysis underlying malignant disease and early release of monocytes to the PB, and in univariate analysis using only CsA for GVHD prophylaxis were found to be the significant risk factors for the development of ES. Patients with ES experienced significantly higher incidence of acute and chronic GVHD and propensity toward a higher rate of TRM. OS did not differ between the patient groups. Thirteen of 17 patients received steroid therapy, and all but one patient responded to therapy. Monitoring for early detection of ES and early intervention with steroid therapy is the key for recovery. The most crucial approach for this purpose mainly is to find out and use the most useful and feasible diagnostic criteria for routine medical practice.
Bibliography:istex:EF56E7FC64545FD352ABE3566FA88604B293879E
ark:/67375/WNG-XMDWSCB2-2
ArticleID:PETR12708
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1397-3142
1399-3046
DOI:10.1111/petr.12708