Proton-Induced Mobility Degradation in FinFETs With Stressor Layers and Strained SOI Substrates
Proton irradiation effects on fin-type field effect transistors (FinFETs) are examined from the viewpoint of their electrical-performance parameter of mobility. They are fabricated with various types of combination of strain/stress techniques to control their mobilities. The base stress level is glo...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 800 - 807 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
IEEE
01-06-2011
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Proton irradiation effects on fin-type field effect transistors (FinFETs) are examined from the viewpoint of their electrical-performance parameter of mobility. They are fabricated with various types of combination of strain/stress techniques to control their mobilities. The base stress level is globally modified by means of nonstrained or strained silicon-on-insulator wafers. Some process splits, additionally, receive a local strain tuning with a contact-etch-stop layer (CESL). Both n - and p -type FinFETs are evaluated. A 60-MeV proton irradiation with a fluence of 10 12 p/cm 2 leads to mobility changes for wide-fin samples: degradation for n -type and enhancement for p -type. These mobility variations can be explained with a change in the number of charged interface traps at the Si and buried-oxide interface. Narrow-fin devices exhibit mobility changes unnoticeable statistically. A comparison with previous studies indicates an elevated source/drain structure plays a role in this mobility preservation. Although the mobility is kept intact in the narrow-fin samples, a close investigation based on a two channel-component model can reveal noticeable mobility variations at a component level. In this study, observed mobility changes are complex depending on the adopted stress techniques as well as process parameters and cannot be explained by the stress levels simply. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TNS.2011.2109967 |