Interactions of the Amino Acid Residue at Position 31 of the c-Ha-Ras Protein with Raf-1 and RalGDS
The Ras and Rap1A proteins can bind to the Raf and RalGDS families. Ras and Rap1A have Glu and Lys, respectively, at position 31. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of mutating the Glu at position 31 of the c-Ha-Ras protein to Asp, Ala, Arg, and Lys on the interactions with Raf-1 and RalG...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 273; no. 13; pp. 7737 - 7742 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27-03-1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Ras and Rap1A proteins can bind to the Raf and RalGDS families. Ras and Rap1A have Glu and Lys, respectively, at position
31. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of mutating the Glu at position 31 of the c-Ha-Ras protein to Asp, Ala,
Arg, and Lys on the interactions with Raf-1 and RalGDS. The Ras-binding domain (RBD) of Raf-1 binds the E31R and E31K Ras
mutants less tightly than the wild-type, E31A, and E31D Ras proteins; the introduction of the positively charged Lys or Arg
residue at position 31 specifically impairs the binding of Ras with the Raf-1 RBD. On the other hand, the ability of the oncogenic
Ras G12V protein to activate Raf-1 in HEK293 cells was only partially reduced by the E31R mutation but was drastically impaired by
the E31K mutation. Correspondingly, Ras G12V (E31K) as well as Rap1A, but not Ras G12V (E31R), exhibited abnormally tight binding with the cysteine-rich domain of Raf-1. On the other hand, the E31A, E31R, and
E31K mutations, but not the E31D mutation, enhanced the RalGDS RBD-binding activity of Ras, indicating that the negative charge
at position 31 of Ras is particularly unfavorable to the interaction with the RalGDS RBD. Ras G12V (E31K), Ras G12V (E31A), and Rap1A stimulate the RalGDS action more efficiently than the wild-type Ras in the liposome reconstitution assay.
All of these results clearly show that the sharp contrast between the characteristics of Ras and Rap1A, with respect to the
interactions with Raf-1 and RalGDS, depends on their residues at position 31. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1074/jbc.273.13.7737 |