Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: A case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China

The concept of ‘ecosystem service’ provides cohesive views on mechanisms by which nature contributes to human well-being. Fast social and economic development calls for research on interactions between human and natural systems. We took the Yanhe Watershed as our study area, and valued the variation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta oecologica (Montrouge) Vol. 44; pp. 46 - 57
Main Authors: Su, Chang-hong, Fu, Bo-Jie, He, Chan-Sheng, Lü, Yi-He
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Masson SAS 01-10-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The concept of ‘ecosystem service’ provides cohesive views on mechanisms by which nature contributes to human well-being. Fast social and economic development calls for research on interactions between human and natural systems. We took the Yanhe Watershed as our study area, and valued the variation of ecosystem services and human activities of 2000 and 2008. Five ecosystem services were selected i.e. net primary production (NPP), carbon sequestration and oxygen production (CSOP), water conservation, soil conservation, and grain production. Human activity was represented by a composite human activity index (HAI) that integrates human population density, farmland ratio, influence of residential sites and road network. Analysis results of the five ecosystem services and human activity (HAI) are as follows: (i) NPP, CSOP, water conservation, and soil conservation increased from 2000 to 2008, while grain production declined. HAI decreased from 2000 to 2008. Spatially, NPP, CSOP, and water conservation in 2000 and 2008 roughly demonstrated a pattern of decline from south to north, while grain production shows an endocentric increasing spatial pattern. Soil conservation showed a spatial pattern of high in the south and low in the north in 2000 and a different pattern of high in the west and low in the east in 2008 respectively. HAI is proportional to the administrative level and economic development. Variation of NPP/CSOP between 2000 and 2008 show an increasing spatial pattern from northwest to southeast. In contrast, the variation of soil conservation shows an increasing pattern from southeast to northwest. Variation of water conservation shows a fanning out decreasing pattern. Variation of grain production doesn’t show conspicuous spatial pattern. (ii) Variation of water conservation and of soil conservation is significantly positively correlated at 0.01 level. Both variations of water conservation and soil conservation are negatively correlated with variation of HAI at 0.01 level. Variations of NPP/CSOP are negatively correlated with variations of soil conservation and grain production at 0.05 level. (iii) Strong tradeoffs exist between regulation services and provision service, while synergies exist within regulation services. Driving effect of human activities on ecosystem services and tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem service are also discussed. ► We valued five ecosystem services of net primary production, carbon sequestration and oxygen production, water conservation, soil conservation, and grain production. ► An integrated human activity index was formulated based on population, farmland ratio, road network, and residential site. ► Tradeoff existed between regulating/supporting services and provisioning service, whereas synergy existed between soil conservation and water conservation. ► The decreasing human activity accounted for the improvement of soil and water conservation.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.11.006
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1146-609X
1873-6238
DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2011.11.006