Multiple roles for U6 snRNA in the splicing pathway

U6 is the most highly conserved of the five spliceosomal RNAs. It is associated with U4 by an extensive base-pairing interaction, which is disrupted immediately prior to the first nucleolytic step of splicing. It has been proposed that this event activates catalysis by unmasking U6. Using a combinat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Genes & development Vol. 4; no. 12B; pp. 2264 - 2277
Main Authors: MADHANI, H. D, BORDONNE, R, GUTHRIE, C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cold Spring Harbor, NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 01-12-1990
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:U6 is the most highly conserved of the five spliceosomal RNAs. It is associated with U4 by an extensive base-pairing interaction, which is disrupted immediately prior to the first nucleolytic step of splicing. It has been proposed that this event activates catalysis by unmasking U6. Using a combination of doped synthesis and site-directed mutagenesis to generate point mutations in U6, we have now identified 12 positions, in three domains, at which single nucleotide substitutions or deletions result in lethal or temperature-sensitive phenotypes. Biochemical analysis demonstrates that most of these mutants retain the ability to assemble into U4/U6 and U4/U5/U6 snRNPs. Notably, although mutations at three positions in U6 that base-pair with U4 are lethal, mutations in the complementary residues in U4 are fully viable. Furthermore, compensatory mutations in U4 that restore base-pairing fail to suppress the phenotypes of the U6 mutations. This demonstrates a function for U6 independent of its role in base-pairing. Remarkably, two of the three essential regions in U6 identified genetically correspond to intron insertion points in two yeast species. A temperature-sensitive mutation at one of these sites is defective in the second step of splicing in vitro.
ISSN:0890-9369
1549-5477
DOI:10.1101/gad.4.12b.2264