Costs of biomass pyrolysis as a negative emission technology: A case study

• Published in: International journal of energy research Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 1232 - 1244
• Main Author: Snyder, Brian F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bognor Regis Hindawi Limited 10-03-2019
• Subjects: Atmospheric models; biochar; Biomass; Carbon; Carbon capture and storage; Carbon dioxide; Carbon sequestration; Carbon sinks; Case studies; Charcoal; Costa Rica; Costs; Electricity pricing; Emission analysis; Gasification; NPV; Prices; Pyrolysis; social cost of carbon
• ISSN: 0363-907X; 1099-114X
• DOI: 10.1002/er.4361

Summary
Biomass pyrolysis is a promising method for the creation of biochar, a potentially long‐lived carbon sink, and renewable fuels. While a number of studies of the costs of pyrolysis exist, many fail to value the carbon storage benefit associated with biochar. Here, we evaluate the costs of three types of small‐scale pyrolysis systems (slow and fast, compared with gasification) in Costa Rica. We find that under many combinations of model parameters, fast and slow pyrolysis models are cost‐effective. Net present values are positive for slow pyrolysis at carbon prices above $7 t−1, indicating that a low carbon price is required to make slow pyrolysis cost‐effective. Likewise, fast pyrolysis is cost‐effective at any positive carbon price. Gasification is generally more costly than fast or slow pyrolysis, and the net present value of the gasification system is only positive at electricity prices over $0.15 kWh−1 or carbon prices over $150 t−1. Thus, both fast and slow pyrolysis models are promising methods for atmospheric CO2 reduction.
A net present value model of biomass pyrolysis is parameterized for a tropical developing world system. Without a cost of carbon, fast and slow pyrolysis systems have slightly positive and slightly negative net cash flows, respectively, but cash flows become strongly positive at carbon prices of 30 or 60 $/t. Gasification systems are never cost effective.