Reinforcement of subliminal flexion reflexes by transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex in subjects with spinal cord injury

• Published in: Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology Vol. 85; no. 2; p. 102
• Main Authors: Hayes, K C, Allatt, R D, Wolfe, D L, Kasai, T, Hsieh, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland 01-04-1992
• Subjects: Adaptation, Physiological - physiology; Adult; Electric Stimulation - methods; Evoked Potentials - physiology; Female; Humans; Male; Motor Cortex - physiology; Motor Neurons - physiology; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Neural Conduction - physiology; Paralysis - physiopathology; Reaction Time - physiology; Reflex - physiology; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology; Subliminal Stimulation; Tibial Nerve - physiology; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
• ISSN: 0013-4694
• DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90075-M

A 20 msec train (500 Hz; 0.1-0.2 msec duration) of percutaneous electrical stimulation (ES) applied to the plantar surface was used to condition muscle responses evoked in tibialis anterior (TA) by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in 8 subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The intensity of conditioning ES was adjusted to just subthreshold for evoking flexion reflexes in TA and was delivered at conditioning-test (C-T) intervals of 15-60 msec prior to cortical stimulation. Four subjects with clinically complete SCI revealed no muscle response to cortical stimulation or following combined subliminal percutaneous ES and cortical stimulation. Four subjects (3 clinically incomplete and 1 complete injury) demonstrated muscle responses with a latency of 70-80 msec time-locked to the percutaneous ES when the conditioning subliminal stimulation was delivered at C-T: 15-40 msec. These responses, resembling suprathreshold flexion reflexes, reflect the convergence of excitatory afferent and cortical inputs and provide evidence of preserved corticospinal innervation to the L4-5 segmental motoneuron or interneuron pools. In 3 of the subjects this preserved corticospinal influence was evident despite absence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following cortical stimulation. The effect of the combined electrical and cortical stimulation in yielding suprathreshold flexion reflexes, instead of the facilitated MEPs seen in control subjects, appears to be related to slowed central conduction, prolonged temporal dispersion of the motoneuron facilitation following cortical stimulation and segmental reflex changes associated with disrupted modulation of interneuronal pathways. The results show this conditioning paradigm to be useful in revealing preserved corticospinal innervation in some SCI subjects with absent MEPs.