Greater efficacy of SPF 100+ sunscreen compared with SPF 50+ in sunburn prevention during 5 consecutive days of sunlight exposure: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
Beach vacations are high-risk settings for overexposure to ultraviolet radiation. To compare the sunburn protective efficacy of SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreens under actual use at the beach. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, split-body/face study of 55 healthy individuals. Each...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Vol. 82; no. 4; pp. 869 - 877 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-04-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Beach vacations are high-risk settings for overexposure to ultraviolet radiation.
To compare the sunburn protective efficacy of SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreens under actual use at the beach.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, split-body/face study of 55 healthy individuals. Each participant applied both sunscreens to randomized sides of the face/body for up to 5 consecutive days. Blinded clinical evaluation of erythema by a single grader and objective instrumental assessments, colorimetry, and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy were performed the morning after each sun exposure.
After 5 days, 31 (56%) participants had more sunburn on the SPF 50+ side compared to 4 (7%) on the SPF 100+ side. Overall, mean erythema intensity showed statistically significantly less erythema on the SPF 100+ side compared with the SPF 50+ side. The first observation of sunburn exclusively on the SPF 50+ side occurred after 1 day of sun exposure, whereas that for SPF 100+ occurred after 3 days of sun exposure.
Only initial sunscreen application was monitored, only 1 participant with skin phototype I was recruited, and participants were recruited from a local beach area.
SPF 100+ was significantly more effective in protecting against ultraviolet radiation–induced erythema and sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use in a beach vacation setting. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Beach vacations are high-risk settings for overexposure to ultraviolet radiation.
To compare the sunburn protective efficacy of SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreens under actual use at the beach.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, split-body/face study of 55 healthy individuals. Each participant applied both sunscreens to randomized sides of the face/body for up to 5 consecutive days. Blinded clinical evaluation of erythema by a single grader and objective instrumental assessments, colorimetry, and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy were performed the morning after each sun exposure.
After 5 days, 31 (56%) participants had more sunburn on the SPF 50+ side compared to 4 (7%) on the SPF 100+ side. Overall, mean erythema intensity showed statistically significantly less erythema on the SPF 100+ side compared with the SPF 50+ side. The first observation of sunburn exclusively on the SPF 50+ side occurred after 1 day of sun exposure, whereas that for SPF 100+ occurred after 3 days of sun exposure.
Only initial sunscreen application was monitored, only 1 participant with skin phototype I was recruited, and participants were recruited from a local beach area.
SPF 100+ was significantly more effective in protecting against ultraviolet radiation-induced erythema and sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use in a beach vacation setting. |
Author | Atillasoy, Evren Lyons, Alexis B. Maitra, Prithwiraj Tian, Xiaoyan Williams, Joshua D. Seo, InSeok Nicholson, Cynthia L. Kohli, Indermeet Lim, Henry W. Hamzavi, Iltefat H. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Indermeet surname: Kohli fullname: Kohli, Indermeet organization: Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan – sequence: 2 givenname: Cynthia L. surname: Nicholson fullname: Nicholson, Cynthia L. organization: Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan – sequence: 3 givenname: Joshua D. surname: Williams fullname: Williams, Joshua D. organization: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Skillman, New Jersey – sequence: 4 givenname: Alexis B. surname: Lyons fullname: Lyons, Alexis B. organization: Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan – sequence: 5 givenname: InSeok surname: Seo fullname: Seo, InSeok organization: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Skillman, New Jersey – sequence: 6 givenname: Prithwiraj surname: Maitra fullname: Maitra, Prithwiraj organization: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Skillman, New Jersey – sequence: 7 givenname: Xiaoyan surname: Tian fullname: Tian, Xiaoyan organization: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Skillman, New Jersey – sequence: 8 givenname: Evren surname: Atillasoy fullname: Atillasoy, Evren organization: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Skillman, New Jersey – sequence: 9 givenname: Henry W. surname: Lim fullname: Lim, Henry W. organization: Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan – sequence: 10 givenname: Iltefat H. surname: Hamzavi fullname: Hamzavi, Iltefat H. email: Ihamzav1@hfhs.org organization: Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kE9v1DAQxS1URLeFL8AB-U6z-M_aSRCXqmoLUqVWAs6WPZ60XmWdyE4Wls_Eh8RhgSPSaOYwv_f09M7ISRwiEvKaszVnXL_brrfW-rVgvF2zMrx5RlactXWl66Y-IavyYFWrhTglZzlvGWPtRtYvyKnkaiM2TK_Iz9uEdsJEsesCWDjQoaOfH24oZ-wtzXPMkBAjhWE32oSefgvT029AlX-IC-LmFOmYcI9xCkOkfk4hPlJVRDEjzFPYI_X2kBfvwvfh8Wmi-H0c8pzwPb2kyUY_7MIP9BfUD7PrsXJ9iJ5C2SVWT6cUbP-SPO9sn_HVn3tOvt5cf7n6WN3d3366uryrQCo9VZ1zAlyjhJXA666uRdNo65VEgI4BCqcaLjfIOOiaaak9MAVaCelar5yU50QcfSENOSfszJjCzqaD4cws1ZutWao3S_WGleFNEb05isbZ7dD_k_ztugAfjgCW6PuAyWQIGAF9SAiT8UP4n_8vnraYuw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s43630_022_00293_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26092698 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_61212 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_det_2022_07_004 crossref_primary_10_33590_emjdermatol_20_00002 crossref_primary_10_14302_issn_2471_2175_jdrt_20_3274 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2020_11_074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2022_07_064 crossref_primary_10_1111_phpp_12710 crossref_primary_10_1002_der2_230 crossref_primary_10_26416_Med_156_6_2023_9062 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2020_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_phpp_12738 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/jid.2010.95 10.1111/bjd.12211 10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008 10.1111/php.12085 10.1038/sj.jid.5700287 10.1001/archderm.144.11.1449 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.029 10.1080/19325037.2016.1271755 10.1038/sj.jid.5700417 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)073<0621:UDOA>2.0.CO;2 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4922 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.062 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.10.126 10.1111/php.12885 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.05.025 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 – notice: Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-6787 |
EndPage | 877 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_jaad_2019_09_018 31542406 S0190962219327550 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Johnson & Johnson funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100004331 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -RU .1- .FO .GJ .XZ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 354 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8F7 8P~ 9JM AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFFNX AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 CAG COF CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEA HMK HMO HVGLF HX~ HZ~ IHE J1W J5H KOM LCYCR LZ2 M27 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OB. OBH OHH OM~ OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TEORI UHS UNMZH UV1 WOW WUQ Y6R YFH Z5R ZCG ZGI ZY1 ~G- AAXKI ADVLN AFJKZ AKRWK NPM AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-fbb2cb852a3c17f772886ad53eccf0ce2b58134e01c670636dc05c6523b9d5b33 |
ISSN | 0190-9622 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 26 17:40:07 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:36:21 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:49:01 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | a UV sunscreen sun protection factor DRS CI medical dermatology SPF UPF sunlight clinical research SPT beach vacation general dermatology prevention HbO2 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-fbb2cb852a3c17f772886ad53eccf0ce2b58134e01c670636dc05c6523b9d5b33 |
PMID | 31542406 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2019_09_018 pubmed_primary_31542406 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jaad_2019_09_018 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April 2020 2020-Apr 2020-04-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2020 text: April 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Am Acad Dermatol |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Ou-Yang, Jiang, Meyer, Wang, Farberg, Rigel (bib8) 2017; 153 O’Riordan, Steffen, Lunde, Gies (bib2) 2008; 144 Mobley, Diffey (bib3) 2018; 94 Petersen, Thieden, Philipsen, Heydenreich, Wulf, Young (bib1) 2013; 168 Godar, Wengraitis, Shreffler, Sliney (bib4) 2001; 73 Williams, Maitra, Atillasoy, Wu, Farberg, Rigel (bib7) 2018; 78 Calzavara-Pinton, Sala, Arisi, Bussoletti, Celleno (bib5) 2013; 148 Russak, Chen, Appa, Rigel (bib15) 2010; 62 Muizzuddin, Marenus, Maes, Smith (bib10) 1990; 41 Ou-Yang, Stanfield, Cole, Appa, Rigel (bib6) 2012; 67 Weihs, Schmalwieser, Reinisch, Meraner, Walisch, Harald (bib14) 2013; 89 Walkosz, Scott, Buller, Andersen, Beck, Cutter (bib13) 2017; 48 (bib18) 2014 Hamzavi (bib17) 2006; 126 Grosick, Tanner (bib12) 2004; 50 Mahmoud, Ruvolo, Hexsel (bib9) 2010; 130 Palmer, Aquilina, Milligan, Walker, Hawk, Young (bib16) 2006; 126 Fitzpatrick (bib11) 1988; 124 Mahmoud (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib9) 2010; 130 Palmer (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib16) 2006; 126 Fitzpatrick (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib11) 1988; 124 Walkosz (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib13) 2017; 48 Mobley (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib3) 2018; 94 Ou-Yang (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib8) 2017; 153 Williams (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib7) 2018; 78 Grosick (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib12) 2004; 50 Godar (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib4) 2001; 73 Weihs (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib14) 2013; 89 Russak (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib15) 2010; 62 O’Riordan (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib2) 2008; 144 Ou-Yang (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib6) 2012; 67 Calzavara-Pinton (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib5) 2013; 148 Muizzuddin (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib10) 1990; 41 Hamzavi (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib17) 2006; 126 Petersen (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib1) 2013; 168 (10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib18) 2014 |
References_xml | – volume: 67 start-page: 1220 year: 2012 end-page: 1227 ident: bib6 article-title: High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥ 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol contributor: fullname: Rigel – volume: 48 start-page: 90 year: 2017 end-page: 99 ident: bib13 article-title: Prevalence of sun protection at outdoor recreation and leisure venues at resorts in North America publication-title: Am J Health Educ contributor: fullname: Cutter – volume: 50 start-page: P31 year: 2004 ident: bib12 article-title: Efficacy as used, not as tested, is true measure of sunscreen performance publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol contributor: fullname: Tanner – volume: 130 start-page: 2092 year: 2010 end-page: 2097 ident: bib9 article-title: Impact of long-wavelength UVA and visible light on melanocompetent skin publication-title: J Invest Dermatol contributor: fullname: Hexsel – volume: 168 start-page: 1073 year: 2013 end-page: 1079 ident: bib1 article-title: Determinants of personal ultraviolet-radiation exposure doses on a sun holiday publication-title: Br J Dermatol contributor: fullname: Young – volume: 153 start-page: 304 year: 2017 end-page: 308 ident: bib8 article-title: Sun protection by beach umbrella vs sunscreen with a high sun protection factor: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA Dermatol contributor: fullname: Rigel – volume: 124 start-page: 869 year: 1988 end-page: 871 ident: bib11 article-title: The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI publication-title: Arch Dermatol contributor: fullname: Fitzpatrick – year: 2014 ident: bib18 article-title: The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer – volume: 73 start-page: 621 year: 2001 end-page: 629 ident: bib4 article-title: UV doses of Americans publication-title: Photochem Photobiol contributor: fullname: Sliney – volume: 126 start-page: 2156 year: 2006 end-page: 2158 ident: bib17 article-title: Photoadaptation: a path toward rational phototherapy protocols publication-title: J Invest Dermatol contributor: fullname: Hamzavi – volume: 62 start-page: 348 year: 2010 end-page: 349 ident: bib15 article-title: A comparison of sunburn protection of high-sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens: SPF 85 sunscreen is significantly more protective than SPF 50 publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol contributor: fullname: Rigel – volume: 148 start-page: 89 year: 2013 end-page: 106 ident: bib5 article-title: Photobiology, photodermatology and sunscreens: a comprehensive overview. Part 1: damage from acute and chronic solar exposure publication-title: G Ital Dermatol Venereol contributor: fullname: Celleno – volume: 89 start-page: 1004 year: 2013 end-page: 1007 ident: bib14 article-title: Measurements of personal UV exposure on different parts of the body during various activities publication-title: Photochem Photobiol contributor: fullname: Harald – volume: 126 start-page: 1256 year: 2006 end-page: 1263 ident: bib16 article-title: Photoadaptation during narrowband ultraviolet-B therapy is independent of skin type: a study of 352 patients publication-title: J Invest Dermatol contributor: fullname: Young – volume: 94 start-page: 611 year: 2018 end-page: 617 ident: bib3 article-title: The solar ultraviolet environment at the ocean publication-title: Photochem Photobiol contributor: fullname: Diffey – volume: 41 start-page: 369 year: 1990 end-page: 378 ident: bib10 article-title: Use of a chromameter in assessing the efficacy of anti-irritants and tanning accelerators publication-title: J Soc Cosmet Chem contributor: fullname: Smith – volume: 144 start-page: 1449 year: 2008 end-page: 1455 ident: bib2 article-title: A day at the beach while on tropical vacation: sun protection practices in a high-risk setting for UV radiation exposure publication-title: Arch Dermatol contributor: fullname: Gies – volume: 78 start-page: 902 year: 2018 end-page: 910.e2 ident: bib7 article-title: SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol contributor: fullname: Rigel – volume: 130 start-page: 2092 issue: 8 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib9 article-title: Impact of long-wavelength UVA and visible light on melanocompetent skin publication-title: J Invest Dermatol doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.95 contributor: fullname: Mahmoud – volume: 168 start-page: 1073 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib1 article-title: Determinants of personal ultraviolet-radiation exposure doses on a sun holiday publication-title: Br J Dermatol doi: 10.1111/bjd.12211 contributor: fullname: Petersen – volume: 124 start-page: 869 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib11 article-title: The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI publication-title: Arch Dermatol doi: 10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008 contributor: fullname: Fitzpatrick – volume: 89 start-page: 1004 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib14 article-title: Measurements of personal UV exposure on different parts of the body during various activities publication-title: Photochem Photobiol doi: 10.1111/php.12085 contributor: fullname: Weihs – volume: 126 start-page: 1256 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib16 article-title: Photoadaptation during narrowband ultraviolet-B therapy is independent of skin type: a study of 352 patients publication-title: J Invest Dermatol doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700287 contributor: fullname: Palmer – volume: 144 start-page: 1449 issue: 11 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib2 article-title: A day at the beach while on tropical vacation: sun protection practices in a high-risk setting for UV radiation exposure publication-title: Arch Dermatol doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.11.1449 contributor: fullname: O’Riordan – volume: 41 start-page: 369 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib10 article-title: Use of a chromameter in assessing the efficacy of anti-irritants and tanning accelerators publication-title: J Soc Cosmet Chem contributor: fullname: Muizzuddin – volume: 67 start-page: 1220 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib6 article-title: High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥ 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.029 contributor: fullname: Ou-Yang – volume: 48 start-page: 90 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib13 article-title: Prevalence of sun protection at outdoor recreation and leisure venues at resorts in North America publication-title: Am J Health Educ doi: 10.1080/19325037.2016.1271755 contributor: fullname: Walkosz – volume: 148 start-page: 89 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib5 article-title: Photobiology, photodermatology and sunscreens: a comprehensive overview. Part 1: damage from acute and chronic solar exposure publication-title: G Ital Dermatol Venereol contributor: fullname: Calzavara-Pinton – volume: 126 start-page: 2156 issue: 10 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib17 article-title: Photoadaptation: a path toward rational phototherapy protocols publication-title: J Invest Dermatol doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700417 contributor: fullname: Hamzavi – volume: 73 start-page: 621 issue: 6 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib4 article-title: UV doses of Americans publication-title: Photochem Photobiol doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)073<0621:UDOA>2.0.CO;2 contributor: fullname: Godar – volume: 153 start-page: 304 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib8 article-title: Sun protection by beach umbrella vs sunscreen with a high sun protection factor: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA Dermatol doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4922 contributor: fullname: Ou-Yang – volume: 78 start-page: 902 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib7 article-title: SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.062 contributor: fullname: Williams – volume: 50 start-page: P31 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib12 article-title: Efficacy as used, not as tested, is true measure of sunscreen performance publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.10.126 contributor: fullname: Grosick – volume: 94 start-page: 611 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib3 article-title: The solar ultraviolet environment at the ocean publication-title: Photochem Photobiol doi: 10.1111/php.12885 contributor: fullname: Mobley – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib18 – volume: 62 start-page: 348 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018_bib15 article-title: A comparison of sunburn protection of high-sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens: SPF 85 sunscreen is significantly more protective than SPF 50 publication-title: J Am Acad Dermatol doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.05.025 contributor: fullname: Russak |
SSID | ssj0009437 |
Score | 2.4419293 |
Snippet | Beach vacations are high-risk settings for overexposure to ultraviolet radiation.
To compare the sunburn protective efficacy of SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreens... |
SourceID | crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 869 |
SubjectTerms | beach clinical research general dermatology medical dermatology prevention SPF sunlight sunscreen sun protection factor vacation |
Title | Greater efficacy of SPF 100+ sunscreen compared with SPF 50+ in sunburn prevention during 5 consecutive days of sunlight exposure: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542406 |
Volume | 82 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3JbtswECWyAEUvRfemG3joTZWhjRLVmxM7SNK0KOAUyE2QSAq2kUhFbB3cb-pHdoakFhfpCtQwBEOiFmueOMPRe0NC3gRlqgqOoxMZR24UqByeuSh2Sx77AtxXwArUDp_Mko-XfDKNpju77dR3_br_amlYB7ZG5exfWLs7KKyA32BzWILVYflHdtdjfnWDRA24_0K_QJ99OnZ8nI750Fk1FXQUyMzaZp9jE6ZbLCpsBPcayVuqpUNaOSNDmvpKiUYzjmS-0UwQaH-Fg3ycL6DGlKPRu4MblPX14qvJp8q6Ka6UW0BcK3tBpp415CcR8kD1Ulkiv_47E_Qm6633Ae_rudF5n6JY51r1sm6AOnTwVld2tKnW80XunI9uyzed1at5kzuTbuP5pjbDjLEuG-ocjoZJksAbcGt05q5V72yRS7WMPo2NLnqkjAPw0sQFB54MPQQPBk9CNOjuuZlmposckludksmPLEfLPMfatH6qK-tat7Nd7HuG14SXhHF1wjAZtR9AFwo9-P74dHp51heUjsKuFADuYAVhhrv445l-E3QNIqqL--SeNTQdGww_IDuqekjufLBkj0fkm4UybaFM65ICTilA2aEdkGkLZIpA1g0YbF9U1MKY9jCmBsaU0QGMKcIYj93CmLYwfkfHtAfxWzqEMG0hTDWEH5PPx9OLoxPXTi7iipDFa7csikAUnAV5KPykhEEm53EuWQh9WukJFRSM-2GkPF_ECcTxsRQeEzELwiKVrAjDJ2Svqiv1jFCRq8jjkokUxj9SCdjOQ8HjJFLwSf0D4rR3P_tiashkLblymaGtMrRV5sHX5weEtQbKbBRsotsM8PTL_Z4aa3bnCGF4hAH783884gtyt3-WXpK99U2jXpHdlWxeWzR-B4l83ss |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27933,27934 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greater+efficacy+of+SPF+100%2B+sunscreen+compared+with+SPF+50%2B+in+sunburn+prevention+during+5+consecutive+days+of+sunlight+exposure%3A+A+randomized%2C+double-blind+clinical+trial&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Academy+of+Dermatology&rft.au=Kohli%2C+Indermeet&rft.au=Nicholson%2C+Cynthia+L.&rft.au=Williams%2C+Joshua+D.&rft.au=Lyons%2C+Alexis+B.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=869&rft.epage=877&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jaad.2019.09.018&rft.externalDocID=S0190962219327550 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0190-9622&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0190-9622&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0190-9622&client=summon |