Differences between women and men with chronic renal disease

The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes. Of the 840 participants in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 13; no. 6; pp. 1430 - 1437
Main Authors: COGGINS, C. H, LEWIS, J. B, CAGGIULA, A. W, CASTALDO, L. S, KLAHR, S, WANG, S.-R
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-06-1998
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes. Of the 840 participants in the MDRD study, 332 (39.5%) were women who were assigned randomly to the dietary protein and blood pressure groups and followed for a median of 2.2 years. A subgroup analysis of the MDRD study database was carried out to compare women and men participants in recruitment, baseline characteristics, adherence to protocol requirements, safety and outcomes, and progression of renal disease and its response to dietary and blood pressure interventions. Adherence by women to the requirements of the protocol including diet, record keeping, office visits, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and urine collections was equivalent to that of men. Women had different renal diagnoses, less proteinuria and lower serum creatinine levels for given GFRs than men. When participants were grouped above and below age 52, the younger women had lower mean arterial pressure than did the men. Older women compared with younger had higher mean arterial pressure, body weight and body mass index, and total low density lipoprotein cholesterol. These differences were not seen between males of the same two age groups. During follow-up, the rate of GFR fall was slower in women, especially in the younger group. However, the association between gender and the rate of fall in GFR was attenuated and became non-significant after adjusting for differences in blood pressure, proteinuria and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In analyses of the full cohort, there were no significant differences between women and men in the effects of the low protein or low blood pressure intervention in patients with either moderate (study A) or advanced (study B) renal disease. However, in subgroup analyses of patients in study A, there was some evidence of a lesser effect in women than in men. This exploratory analysis of the MDRD study indicates a slower mean GFR decline in women as compared with men. The slower mean GFR decline and suggestive evidence of a lesser beneficial effect of the low protein diet and low blood pressure interventions in women suggest that gender differences should be considered in trials of the effects of these interventions on the progression of renal disease. Also, the participation of women in the MDRD study was excellent and equivalent to that of men.
AbstractList The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes. Of the 840 participants in the MDRD study, 332 (39.5%) were women who were assigned randomly to the dietary protein and blood pressure groups and followed for a median of 2.2 years. A subgroup analysis of the MDRD study database was carried out to compare women and men participants in recruitment, baseline characteristics, adherence to protocol requirements, safety and outcomes, and progression of renal disease and its response to dietary and blood pressure interventions. Adherence by women to the requirements of the protocol including diet, record keeping, office visits, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and urine collections was equivalent to that of men. Women had different renal diagnoses, less proteinuria and lower serum creatinine levels for given GFRs than men. When participants were grouped above and below age 52, the younger women had lower mean arterial pressure than did the men. Older women compared with younger had higher mean arterial pressure, body weight and body mass index, and total low density lipoprotein cholesterol. These differences were not seen between males of the same two age groups. During follow-up, the rate of GFR fall was slower in women, especially in the younger group. However, the association between gender and the rate of fall in GFR was attenuated and became non-significant after adjusting for differences in blood pressure, proteinuria and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In analyses of the full cohort, there were no significant differences between women and men in the effects of the low protein or low blood pressure intervention in patients with either moderate (study A) or advanced (study B) renal disease. However, in subgroup analyses of patients in study A, there was some evidence of a lesser effect in women than in men. This exploratory analysis of the MDRD study indicates a slower mean GFR decline in women as compared with men. The slower mean GFR decline and suggestive evidence of a lesser beneficial effect of the low protein diet and low blood pressure interventions in women suggest that gender differences should be considered in trials of the effects of these interventions on the progression of renal disease. Also, the participation of women in the MDRD study was excellent and equivalent to that of men.
BACKGROUNDThe purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes.METHODSOf the 840 participants in the MDRD study, 332 (39.5%) were women who were assigned randomly to the dietary protein and blood pressure groups and followed for a median of 2.2 years. A subgroup analysis of the MDRD study database was carried out to compare women and men participants in recruitment, baseline characteristics, adherence to protocol requirements, safety and outcomes, and progression of renal disease and its response to dietary and blood pressure interventions.RESULTSAdherence by women to the requirements of the protocol including diet, record keeping, office visits, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and urine collections was equivalent to that of men. Women had different renal diagnoses, less proteinuria and lower serum creatinine levels for given GFRs than men. When participants were grouped above and below age 52, the younger women had lower mean arterial pressure than did the men. Older women compared with younger had higher mean arterial pressure, body weight and body mass index, and total low density lipoprotein cholesterol. These differences were not seen between males of the same two age groups. During follow-up, the rate of GFR fall was slower in women, especially in the younger group. However, the association between gender and the rate of fall in GFR was attenuated and became non-significant after adjusting for differences in blood pressure, proteinuria and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In analyses of the full cohort, there were no significant differences between women and men in the effects of the low protein or low blood pressure intervention in patients with either moderate (study A) or advanced (study B) renal disease. However, in subgroup analyses of patients in study A, there was some evidence of a lesser effect in women than in men.CONCLUSIONSThis exploratory analysis of the MDRD study indicates a slower mean GFR decline in women as compared with men. The slower mean GFR decline and suggestive evidence of a lesser beneficial effect of the low protein diet and low blood pressure interventions in women suggest that gender differences should be considered in trials of the effects of these interventions on the progression of renal disease. Also, the participation of women in the MDRD study was excellent and equivalent to that of men.
Author KLAHR, S
LEWIS, J. B
COGGINS, C. H
WANG, S.-R
CAGGIULA, A. W
CASTALDO, L. S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: C. H
  surname: COGGINS
  fullname: COGGINS, C. H
  organization: Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Vanderbilt University, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J. B
  surname: LEWIS
  fullname: LEWIS, J. B
  organization: Vanderbilt University, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: A. W
  surname: CAGGIULA
  fullname: CAGGIULA, A. W
  organization: University of Pittsburgh, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: L. S
  surname: CASTALDO
  fullname: CASTALDO, L. S
  organization: Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
– sequence: 5
  givenname: S
  surname: KLAHR
  fullname: KLAHR, S
  organization: Washington University School of Medicine, United States
– sequence: 6
  givenname: S.-R
  surname: WANG
  fullname: WANG, S.-R
  organization: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, United States
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2256874$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9641172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kDtrwzAYRUVJSZO0Y8eCh9LNieRPlizoUtInBLq0s9DLxMWWU8kh9N9XISbLvcM93OHM0cT33iF0S_CSYAErb4cVgSVbEgr4As0IZTgvoConaJZ2kuMSiys0j_EHYywKzqdoKhglhBcz9Pjc1LULzhsXM-2Gg3M-O_RdSuVtduxDM2wzsw29b0yWSNVmtolORXeNLmvVRncz9gJ9v758rd_zzefbx_ppkxso2ZBb7jSBCoCCVqamhS51QU1FGBakBGU5E1pwowA0WCAEK2Wt4YaXTIGmsEAPp99d6H_3Lg6ya6Jxbau86_dRciFYOqoSmJ9AE_oYg6vlLjSdCn-SYHm0JZMtSUAyebSV-LvxeK87Z8_0qCft9-OuolFtHZQ3TTxjRVGyilP4B9bgc2I
CODEN NDTREA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1462_8902_2004_00338_x
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2019_05_019
crossref_primary_10_1124_dmd_107_014845
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2018_00138
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11560_023_00698_8
crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_2016040454
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00357_2016
crossref_primary_10_1053_ajkd_2002_31401
crossref_primary_10_1177_089686080302300311
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ki_5002297
crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfab017
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ki_5001880
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm9040052
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_32279_z
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ackd_2004_10_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_12381
crossref_primary_10_1210_clinem_dgae374
crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_03990318
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_00_70042_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semnephrol_2017_02_009
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2021_659339
crossref_primary_10_1159_000501021
crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0b013e328359b6a9
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1524_6175_2004_03555_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_hmg_ddaa040
crossref_primary_10_33590_emj_10312319
crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_15771
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ekir_2018_01_010
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12902_021_00817_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNH_0000000000000463
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semnephrol_2022_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1159_000524594
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2022_12_016
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e31823015e4
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00022_2007
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41581_023_00784_z
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12882_020_01946_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_eci_12274
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_03_00916_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12082834
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2007_09_023
crossref_primary_10_1097_00004872_200309000_00021
crossref_primary_10_1097_GME_0000000000001062
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ackd_2013_05_004
crossref_primary_10_1053_ajkd_2001_27691
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2005_14_617
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2023_1097596
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cjco_2023_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1161_HYPERTENSIONAHA_108_120022
crossref_primary_10_1111_nep_14051
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2023_1184025
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_03_00405_0
crossref_primary_10_1097_00041552_200405000_00007
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2005_11_027
crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_12677
crossref_primary_10_1177_002215540205001211
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11560_020_00409_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_670674
crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfm919
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00249_2010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semnephrol_2009_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2018_12_024
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001892_pub5
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001892_pub4
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2004_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrneph_2017_181
crossref_primary_10_1097_FJC_0b013e31802cb88e
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2796_2004_01340_x
crossref_primary_10_1210_endrev_bnaa034
crossref_primary_10_1530_eje_1_02319
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2023_1232266
crossref_primary_10_1080_20786190_2016_1151641
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1523_1755_2005_00487_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfaa095
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2007_01_009
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2003_12_046
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutos_2023_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfu394
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tig_2005_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1590_acb391324
crossref_primary_10_1002_dat_20155
crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_2018030296
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2012_10_117
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00398_2021
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1751_0813_2006_tb12796_x
crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_0000000000000289
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajh_2012_21
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_99_70046_6
crossref_primary_10_1042_CS20160047
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2369_11_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idh_2018_01_002
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0252978
crossref_primary_10_2147_IJGM_S323015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_genm_2008_03_002
crossref_primary_10_5551_jat_37523
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1523_1755_2000_07513_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_14779072_2017_1294066
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 1998 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 1998 INIST-CNRS
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1093/ndt/13.6.1430
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1460-2385
EndPage 1437
ExternalDocumentID 10_1093_ndt_13_6_1430
9641172
2256874
Genre Multicenter Study
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-E4
.2P
.55
.GJ
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
0R~
123
18M
1TH
29M
2WC
4.4
482
48X
53G
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
6.Y
70D
AABJS
AABMN
AABZA
AACZT
AAESY
AAHTB
AAIYJ
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAMDB
AAMVS
AANRK
AAOGV
AAPBV
AAPGJ
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AAUGY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABKDP
ABNKS
ABOCM
ABPEJ
ABPTD
ABPTK
ABQLI
ABQTQ
ABSAR
ABSMQ
ABWST
ABZBJ
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIMA
ACPQN
ACPRK
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACYHN
ADBBV
ADEIU
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJQC
ADOCK
ADORX
ADQLU
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEGXH
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEKSI
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFZL
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFXAL
AFXEN
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHMBA
AHXPO
AIAGR
AIJHB
AIKOY
AIMBJ
AJEEA
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
APIBT
APJGH
APWMN
AQDSO
AQKUS
ASMCH
ASPBG
ATTQO
AVWKF
AWCFO
AXUDD
AZFZN
AZQFJ
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BGYMP
BHONS
BTRTY
BVRKM
BYORX
BZKNY
C45
CAG
CASEJ
CDBKE
COF
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DIK
DILTD
DPORF
DPPUQ
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
EIHJH
EJD
ENERS
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FEDTE
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H13
H5~
HAR
HW0
HZ~
IOX
IQODW
J21
KAQDR
KBUDW
KC5
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
M-Z
M49
MBLQV
MHKGH
ML0
N9A
NGC
NOMLY
NOYVH
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OBFPC
OCZFY
ODMLO
OHH
OJQWA
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
O~Y
P2P
P6G
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
QBD
R44
RD5
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
RZF
RZO
SDH
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TMA
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7H
X7M
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZA5
ZGI
ZKX
ZXP
~91
AARHZ
AAUAY
ABJNI
ABNHQ
ABQNK
ABXVV
ACMRT
ACZBC
ADQBN
AEHUL
AFSHK
AGMDO
ATGXG
AVNTJ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
HVGLF
JXSIZ
NPM
OJZSN
AAYXX
ABEJV
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d7eb1383343bacf42b5b24c81609153ad769b97ca33b3d3110aaddc7c756a3b43
ISSN 0931-0509
1460-2385
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 00:55:29 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 21:36:59 EST 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:51:41 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 29 17:07:39 EDT 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Kidney disease
Human
Chronic
Urinary system disease
Glomerular filtration
Renal function
Renal failure
Sex
Evolution
Exploration
Comparative study
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-d7eb1383343bacf42b5b24c81609153ad769b97ca33b3d3110aaddc7c756a3b43
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-pdf/13/6/1430/9896716/1430.pdf
PMID 9641172
PQID 79961538
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_79961538
crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_13_6_1430
pubmed_primary_9641172
pascalfrancis_primary_2256874
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1998-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1998-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 1998
  text: 1998-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
– name: England
PublicationTitle Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
PublicationTitleAlternate Nephrol Dial Transplant
PublicationYear 1998
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
SSID ssj0009277
Score 1.9833845
Snippet The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study,...
BACKGROUNDThe purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1430
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Pressure
Cholesterol, HDL - blood
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Combined Modality Therapy
Creatinine - metabolism
Diet, Protein-Restricted
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - diet therapy
Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy
Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure
Patient Selection
Prospective Studies
Renal failure
Sex Characteristics
Title Differences between women and men with chronic renal disease
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9641172
https://search.proquest.com/docview/79961538
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZokRASQrwqUij4gLhE22Z3du21xAXSVEWEciCVerP82gMKm6pJ1L_P2Ot9BIGAA5eN17K90czn8Xg8MybkjRNMlxYnYImrW5KLFBKtc5YIi0XjE7hbb-84_8ovrsrTWT7r3Zr7uv_KaaxDXvvI2X_gdjcoVmAZeY5P5Do-_4rvp_HGE-9p1TphhTQL4ZjgewzbHpsmKe4YW_50TPOtzeeEbO5CWXx4ic9d4subkA99qerdU_zpqjNeD0IePiBU3M147m6bzp1Zeqqw-XaponDqq1FdXdpgwJ1Hu6zto_Ra56nWughp4lPL7AhaGABqKDVRZ5sMVmB85b-U7k3mq9puvLkBjtlx33GYR_viizy7nM_lYna12CN3MxRBYbP98VOfjjkLd3J2fzNmX8X3Exz-pBt8R1t5cK3WOHGq5saT329JgmqyeEQexj0Ffd-A4TG54-on5N7n6DXxlLwbYIJGTNCACYqYoP7XY4JGTNCACRox8Yxcns0W0_Mk3pqRGCjYJrEcl18oAXLQylR5pgud5aZMGaqGBSjLmdCCGwWgwQKqfwrXOMMNL5gCncMB2a9XtXtOaFExwwVOW4GKXsVLzS3LVJXxiVPCpZMRedtSR143yVFk49QAEskoU5BMejKOyNEO7brWuJqwkucj8rqlpUTx5s-sVO1W27XEz_stSTkiBw2Ju66C5Slq34d_7PqC3O8h-pLsb2627ojsre32VQDFD86Sc2o
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+between+women+and+men+with+chronic+renal+disease&rft.jtitle=Nephrology%2C+dialysis%2C+transplantation&rft.au=Coggins%2C+C+H&rft.au=Breyer+Lewis%2C+J&rft.au=Caggiula%2C+A+W&rft.au=Castaldo%2C+L+S&rft.date=1998-06-01&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1430&rft.epage=1437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fndt%2F13.6.1430&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0931-0509&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0931-0509&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0931-0509&client=summon