Differences between women and men with chronic renal disease
The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes. Of the 840 participants in the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 13; no. 6; pp. 1430 - 1437 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01-06-1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes.
Of the 840 participants in the MDRD study, 332 (39.5%) were women who were assigned randomly to the dietary protein and blood pressure groups and followed for a median of 2.2 years. A subgroup analysis of the MDRD study database was carried out to compare women and men participants in recruitment, baseline characteristics, adherence to protocol requirements, safety and outcomes, and progression of renal disease and its response to dietary and blood pressure interventions.
Adherence by women to the requirements of the protocol including diet, record keeping, office visits, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and urine collections was equivalent to that of men. Women had different renal diagnoses, less proteinuria and lower serum creatinine levels for given GFRs than men. When participants were grouped above and below age 52, the younger women had lower mean arterial pressure than did the men. Older women compared with younger had higher mean arterial pressure, body weight and body mass index, and total low density lipoprotein cholesterol. These differences were not seen between males of the same two age groups. During follow-up, the rate of GFR fall was slower in women, especially in the younger group. However, the association between gender and the rate of fall in GFR was attenuated and became non-significant after adjusting for differences in blood pressure, proteinuria and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In analyses of the full cohort, there were no significant differences between women and men in the effects of the low protein or low blood pressure intervention in patients with either moderate (study A) or advanced (study B) renal disease. However, in subgroup analyses of patients in study A, there was some evidence of a lesser effect in women than in men.
This exploratory analysis of the MDRD study indicates a slower mean GFR decline in women as compared with men. The slower mean GFR decline and suggestive evidence of a lesser beneficial effect of the low protein diet and low blood pressure interventions in women suggest that gender differences should be considered in trials of the effects of these interventions on the progression of renal disease. Also, the participation of women in the MDRD study was excellent and equivalent to that of men. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes.
Of the 840 participants in the MDRD study, 332 (39.5%) were women who were assigned randomly to the dietary protein and blood pressure groups and followed for a median of 2.2 years. A subgroup analysis of the MDRD study database was carried out to compare women and men participants in recruitment, baseline characteristics, adherence to protocol requirements, safety and outcomes, and progression of renal disease and its response to dietary and blood pressure interventions.
Adherence by women to the requirements of the protocol including diet, record keeping, office visits, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and urine collections was equivalent to that of men. Women had different renal diagnoses, less proteinuria and lower serum creatinine levels for given GFRs than men. When participants were grouped above and below age 52, the younger women had lower mean arterial pressure than did the men. Older women compared with younger had higher mean arterial pressure, body weight and body mass index, and total low density lipoprotein cholesterol. These differences were not seen between males of the same two age groups. During follow-up, the rate of GFR fall was slower in women, especially in the younger group. However, the association between gender and the rate of fall in GFR was attenuated and became non-significant after adjusting for differences in blood pressure, proteinuria and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In analyses of the full cohort, there were no significant differences between women and men in the effects of the low protein or low blood pressure intervention in patients with either moderate (study A) or advanced (study B) renal disease. However, in subgroup analyses of patients in study A, there was some evidence of a lesser effect in women than in men.
This exploratory analysis of the MDRD study indicates a slower mean GFR decline in women as compared with men. The slower mean GFR decline and suggestive evidence of a lesser beneficial effect of the low protein diet and low blood pressure interventions in women suggest that gender differences should be considered in trials of the effects of these interventions on the progression of renal disease. Also, the participation of women in the MDRD study was excellent and equivalent to that of men. BACKGROUNDThe purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, and to assess gender differences in their renal outcomes.METHODSOf the 840 participants in the MDRD study, 332 (39.5%) were women who were assigned randomly to the dietary protein and blood pressure groups and followed for a median of 2.2 years. A subgroup analysis of the MDRD study database was carried out to compare women and men participants in recruitment, baseline characteristics, adherence to protocol requirements, safety and outcomes, and progression of renal disease and its response to dietary and blood pressure interventions.RESULTSAdherence by women to the requirements of the protocol including diet, record keeping, office visits, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and urine collections was equivalent to that of men. Women had different renal diagnoses, less proteinuria and lower serum creatinine levels for given GFRs than men. When participants were grouped above and below age 52, the younger women had lower mean arterial pressure than did the men. Older women compared with younger had higher mean arterial pressure, body weight and body mass index, and total low density lipoprotein cholesterol. These differences were not seen between males of the same two age groups. During follow-up, the rate of GFR fall was slower in women, especially in the younger group. However, the association between gender and the rate of fall in GFR was attenuated and became non-significant after adjusting for differences in blood pressure, proteinuria and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In analyses of the full cohort, there were no significant differences between women and men in the effects of the low protein or low blood pressure intervention in patients with either moderate (study A) or advanced (study B) renal disease. However, in subgroup analyses of patients in study A, there was some evidence of a lesser effect in women than in men.CONCLUSIONSThis exploratory analysis of the MDRD study indicates a slower mean GFR decline in women as compared with men. The slower mean GFR decline and suggestive evidence of a lesser beneficial effect of the low protein diet and low blood pressure interventions in women suggest that gender differences should be considered in trials of the effects of these interventions on the progression of renal disease. Also, the participation of women in the MDRD study was excellent and equivalent to that of men. |
Author | KLAHR, S LEWIS, J. B COGGINS, C. H WANG, S.-R CAGGIULA, A. W CASTALDO, L. S |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: C. H surname: COGGINS fullname: COGGINS, C. H organization: Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Vanderbilt University, United States – sequence: 2 givenname: J. B surname: LEWIS fullname: LEWIS, J. B organization: Vanderbilt University, United States – sequence: 3 givenname: A. W surname: CAGGIULA fullname: CAGGIULA, A. W organization: University of Pittsburgh, United States – sequence: 4 givenname: L. S surname: CASTALDO fullname: CASTALDO, L. S organization: Massachusetts General Hospital, United States – sequence: 5 givenname: S surname: KLAHR fullname: KLAHR, S organization: Washington University School of Medicine, United States – sequence: 6 givenname: S.-R surname: WANG fullname: WANG, S.-R organization: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, United States |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2256874$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9641172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo9kDtrwzAYRUVJSZO0Y8eCh9LNieRPlizoUtInBLq0s9DLxMWWU8kh9N9XISbLvcM93OHM0cT33iF0S_CSYAErb4cVgSVbEgr4As0IZTgvoConaJZ2kuMSiys0j_EHYywKzqdoKhglhBcz9Pjc1LULzhsXM-2Gg3M-O_RdSuVtduxDM2wzsw29b0yWSNVmtolORXeNLmvVRncz9gJ9v758rd_zzefbx_ppkxso2ZBb7jSBCoCCVqamhS51QU1FGBakBGU5E1pwowA0WCAEK2Wt4YaXTIGmsEAPp99d6H_3Lg6ya6Jxbau86_dRciFYOqoSmJ9AE_oYg6vlLjSdCn-SYHm0JZMtSUAyebSV-LvxeK87Z8_0qCft9-OuolFtHZQ3TTxjRVGyilP4B9bgc2I |
CODEN | NDTREA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1462_8902_2004_00338_x crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2019_05_019 crossref_primary_10_1124_dmd_107_014845 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2018_00138 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11560_023_00698_8 crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_2016040454 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00357_2016 crossref_primary_10_1053_ajkd_2002_31401 crossref_primary_10_1177_089686080302300311 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ki_5002297 crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfab017 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ki_5001880 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm9040052 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_32279_z crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ackd_2004_10_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_12381 crossref_primary_10_1210_clinem_dgae374 crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_03990318 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_00_70042_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semnephrol_2017_02_009 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2021_659339 crossref_primary_10_1159_000501021 crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0b013e328359b6a9 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1524_6175_2004_03555_x crossref_primary_10_1093_hmg_ddaa040 crossref_primary_10_33590_emj_10312319 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_15771 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ekir_2018_01_010 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12902_021_00817_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_MNH_0000000000000463 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semnephrol_2022_04_008 crossref_primary_10_1159_000524594 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2022_12_016 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e31823015e4 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00022_2007 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41581_023_00784_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s12882_020_01946_y crossref_primary_10_1111_eci_12274 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_03_00916_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12082834 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2007_09_023 crossref_primary_10_1097_00004872_200309000_00021 crossref_primary_10_1097_GME_0000000000001062 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ackd_2013_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1053_ajkd_2001_27691 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2005_14_617 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2023_1097596 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cjco_2023_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1161_HYPERTENSIONAHA_108_120022 crossref_primary_10_1111_nep_14051 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2023_1184025 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_03_00405_0 crossref_primary_10_1097_00041552_200405000_00007 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2005_11_027 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_12677 crossref_primary_10_1177_002215540205001211 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11560_020_00409_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_670674 crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfm919 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00249_2010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semnephrol_2009_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2018_12_024 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001892_pub5 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD001892_pub4 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2004_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrneph_2017_181 crossref_primary_10_1097_FJC_0b013e31802cb88e crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2796_2004_01340_x crossref_primary_10_1210_endrev_bnaa034 crossref_primary_10_1530_eje_1_02319 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2023_1232266 crossref_primary_10_1080_20786190_2016_1151641 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1523_1755_2005_00487_x crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfaa095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2007_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2003_12_046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutos_2023_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfu394 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tig_2005_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1590_acb391324 crossref_primary_10_1002_dat_20155 crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_2018030296 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2012_10_117 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajprenal_00398_2021 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1751_0813_2006_tb12796_x crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_0000000000000289 crossref_primary_10_1038_ajh_2012_21 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_6386_99_70046_6 crossref_primary_10_1042_CS20160047 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2369_11_20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idh_2018_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0252978 crossref_primary_10_2147_IJGM_S323015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_genm_2008_03_002 crossref_primary_10_5551_jat_37523 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1523_1755_2000_07513_x crossref_primary_10_1080_14779072_2017_1294066 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 1998 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 1998 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1093/ndt/13.6.1430 |
DatabaseName | Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1460-2385 |
EndPage | 1437 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1093_ndt_13_6_1430 9641172 2256874 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Comparative Study Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -E4 .2P .55 .GJ .I3 .XZ .ZR 0R~ 123 18M 1TH 29M 2WC 4.4 482 48X 53G 5RE 5VS 5WA 5WD 6.Y 70D AABJS AABMN AABZA AACZT AAESY AAHTB AAIYJ AAJKP AAJQQ AAMDB AAMVS AANRK AAOGV AAPBV AAPGJ AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AAUGY AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT ABEUO ABIXL ABKDP ABNKS ABOCM ABPEJ ABPTD ABPTK ABQLI ABQTQ ABSAR ABSMQ ABWST ABZBJ ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACIMA ACPQN ACPRK ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ACYHN ADBBV ADEIU ADEYI ADEZT ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJQC ADOCK ADORX ADQLU ADRIX ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW ADZXQ AEGPL AEGXH AEJOX AEKPW AEKSI AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFZL AFIYH AFOFC AFXAL AFXEN AFYAG AGINJ AGKEF AGKRT AGQXC AGSYK AGUTN AHMBA AHXPO AIAGR AIJHB AIKOY AIMBJ AJEEA AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC ALXQX APIBT APJGH APWMN AQDSO AQKUS ASMCH ASPBG ATTQO AVWKF AWCFO AXUDD AZFZN AZQFJ BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BGYMP BHONS BTRTY BVRKM BYORX BZKNY C45 CAG CASEJ CDBKE COF CS3 CZ4 DAKXR DIK DILTD DPORF DPPUQ DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EE~ EIHJH EJD ENERS F5P F9B FECEO FEDTE FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK GAUVT GJXCC GX1 H13 H5~ HAR HW0 HZ~ IOX IQODW J21 KAQDR KBUDW KC5 KOP KQ8 KSI KSN M-Z M49 MBLQV MHKGH ML0 N9A NGC NOMLY NOYVH NTWIH NU- NVLIB O0~ O9- OAUYM OAWHX OBFPC OCZFY ODMLO OHH OJQWA OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF O~Y P2P P6G PAFKI PB- PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y QBD R44 RD5 RNI ROL ROX ROZ RUSNO RW1 RXO RZF RZO SDH TCURE TEORI TJX TMA TR2 W8F WH7 WOQ X7H X7M YAYTL YKOAZ YXANX ZA5 ZGI ZKX ZXP ~91 AARHZ AAUAY ABJNI ABNHQ ABQNK ABXVV ACMRT ACZBC ADQBN AEHUL AFSHK AGMDO ATGXG AVNTJ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF HVGLF JXSIZ NPM OJZSN AAYXX ABEJV CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d7eb1383343bacf42b5b24c81609153ad769b97ca33b3d3110aaddc7c756a3b43 |
ISSN | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 00:55:29 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 21:36:59 EST 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:51:41 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 29 17:07:39 EDT 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | Kidney disease Human Chronic Urinary system disease Glomerular filtration Renal function Renal failure Sex Evolution Exploration Comparative study |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-d7eb1383343bacf42b5b24c81609153ad769b97ca33b3d3110aaddc7c756a3b43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-pdf/13/6/1430/9896716/1430.pdf |
PMID | 9641172 |
PQID | 79961538 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_79961538 crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_13_6_1430 pubmed_primary_9641172 pascalfrancis_primary_2256874 |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1998-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1998-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 1998 text: 1998-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Nephrol Dial Transplant |
PublicationYear | 1998 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
SSID | ssj0009277 |
Score | 1.9833845 |
Snippet | The purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study,... BACKGROUNDThe purpose of the present study was to compare the participation of women and men in the protocols of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed pascalfrancis |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1430 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Blood Pressure Cholesterol, HDL - blood Cholesterol, LDL - blood Combined Modality Therapy Creatinine - metabolism Diet, Protein-Restricted Female Glomerular Filtration Rate Humans Kidney Failure, Chronic - diet therapy Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Nephropathies. Renovascular diseases. Renal failure Patient Selection Prospective Studies Renal failure Sex Characteristics |
Title | Differences between women and men with chronic renal disease |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9641172 https://search.proquest.com/docview/79961538 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZokRASQrwqUij4gLhE22Z3du21xAXSVEWEciCVerP82gMKm6pJ1L_P2Ot9BIGAA5eN17K90czn8Xg8MybkjRNMlxYnYImrW5KLFBKtc5YIi0XjE7hbb-84_8ovrsrTWT7r3Zr7uv_KaaxDXvvI2X_gdjcoVmAZeY5P5Do-_4rvp_HGE-9p1TphhTQL4ZjgewzbHpsmKe4YW_50TPOtzeeEbO5CWXx4ic9d4subkA99qerdU_zpqjNeD0IePiBU3M147m6bzp1Zeqqw-XaponDqq1FdXdpgwJ1Hu6zto_Ra56nWughp4lPL7AhaGABqKDVRZ5sMVmB85b-U7k3mq9puvLkBjtlx33GYR_viizy7nM_lYna12CN3MxRBYbP98VOfjjkLd3J2fzNmX8X3Exz-pBt8R1t5cK3WOHGq5saT329JgmqyeEQexj0Ffd-A4TG54-on5N7n6DXxlLwbYIJGTNCACYqYoP7XY4JGTNCACRox8Yxcns0W0_Mk3pqRGCjYJrEcl18oAXLQylR5pgud5aZMGaqGBSjLmdCCGwWgwQKqfwrXOMMNL5gCncMB2a9XtXtOaFExwwVOW4GKXsVLzS3LVJXxiVPCpZMRedtSR143yVFk49QAEskoU5BMejKOyNEO7brWuJqwkucj8rqlpUTx5s-sVO1W27XEz_stSTkiBw2Ju66C5Slq34d_7PqC3O8h-pLsb2627ojsre32VQDFD86Sc2o |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27933,27934 |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+between+women+and+men+with+chronic+renal+disease&rft.jtitle=Nephrology%2C+dialysis%2C+transplantation&rft.au=Coggins%2C+C+H&rft.au=Breyer+Lewis%2C+J&rft.au=Caggiula%2C+A+W&rft.au=Castaldo%2C+L+S&rft.date=1998-06-01&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1430&rft.epage=1437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fndt%2F13.6.1430&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0931-0509&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0931-0509&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0931-0509&client=summon |