Completion of an Individualized Learning Plan for Otology-Related Milestone Subcompetencies Leads to Improved Otology Section Otolaryngology Training Exam Scores

• Published in: Otology & neurotology Vol. 40; no. 10; pp. 1392 - 1398
• Main Authors: Pennock, Michael, Svrakic, Maja, Bent, John P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Copyright by Otology & Neurotology, Inc. Image copyright Wolters Kluwer Health/Anatomical Chart Company 01-12-2019
• ISSN: 1531-7129; 1537-4505
• DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002392

OBJECTIVE:To examine the relationships among self-assessment of knowledge in otology via an individualized learning plan (ILP), otology milestone achievement rate, and otolaryngology training exam (OTE) otology scores.
STUDY DESIGN:Prospective study.
SETTING:One otolaryngology residency covering a tertiary care facility, trauma and hospital center, outpatient ambulatory surgery center, and outpatient clinics.
PARTICIPANTS:Twenty otolaryngology residents, four from each class.
METHODS:Residents identified four milestones from otology-related sub-competencies to achieve in a 3-month rotation via an ILP. During the same rotation, the residents sat for the OTE, and their overall and otology scores were analyzed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Completion of an ILP before and at the end of the rotation, self-reported achievement of otology milestones, and OTE score components including total percent correct, scaled score, group stanine, national stanine, and residency group weighted scores.
RESULTS:Group stanine OTE otology scores were higher for those residents who completed pre- and post-rotation ILPs compared with those who did not, 4.0 (±0.348) versus 2.75 (±0.453), respectively (p = 0.04). Residents who self-reported achieving all four otology milestones had significantly higher otology group stanine scores than the residents who achieved less, 4.1 (±0.348) versus 2.9 ± 0.433, respectively (p = 0.045). Residents who performed well in their PGY program cohort on the otology OTE 1 year were less inclined to complete an ILP for otology in the subsequent year (Pearson correlation –0.528, p = 0.035).
CONCLUSION:In the otology subspecialty, residents who completed ILPs scored better on OTE examinations independent of resident class. Consequently, programs may find ILPs useful in other otolaryngology subspecialties and across residencies.