Quantitative analysis on the phase margin of ADRC

The paper analyzes and compares the phase margins of four active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) designs, which are based on different common-used extended state observers (ESOs) of various orders, for second-order systems. The quantitative results indicate that, besides good dynamic response,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Control theory and technology Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 4 - 15
Main Authors: Zhong, Sheng, Huang, Yi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-02-2023
Springer Nature B.V
Key Laboratory of Systems and Control,Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China
Beijing Aerospace Automatic Control Institute,Beijing 100854,China
School of Mathematical Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China%Key Laboratory of Systems and Control,Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China
School of Mathematical Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The paper analyzes and compares the phase margins of four active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) designs, which are based on different common-used extended state observers (ESOs) of various orders, for second-order systems. The quantitative results indicate that, besides good dynamic response, ADRC can guarantee enough phase margin. It is also proved that by decreasing the order of ESO, the phase margin can be increased. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the phase margins of the ADRC-based systems can be almost uninfluenced by the uncertainties of the system parameters. Finally, the theoretical results are verified by both simulations and experiments on a motion control platform.
ISSN:2095-6983
2198-0942
DOI:10.1007/s11768-023-00128-z