Midface Skeletal Sexual Dimorphism: Lessons Learned from Advanced Three-dimensional Imaging in the White Population

Facial shape is significantly influenced by the underlying facial bony skeleton. Sexual dimorphisms in these structures are crucial for craniofacial, aesthetic, and gender-affirming surgery. Previous studies have examined the orbits and upper face, but less is known about the midface. This study aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open Vol. 12; no. 10; p. e6215
Main Authors: Abushehab, Abdallah, Rames, Jess D, Hussein, Sara M, Meire Pazelli, Alexandre, Sears, Tori A, Wentworth, Adam J, Morris, Jonathan M, Sharaf, Basel A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-10-2024
Wolters Kluwer
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Facial shape is significantly influenced by the underlying facial bony skeleton. Sexual dimorphisms in these structures are crucial for craniofacial, aesthetic, and gender-affirming surgery. Previous studies have examined the orbits and upper face, but less is known about the midface. This study aimed to elucidate the sexual dimorphism in the midface region, focusing on the maxilla and zygomatic bones. A retrospective review was conducted using facial computed tomography scans from 101 White patients aged 20-79 years, using Materialise Mimics and 3-Matics for segmentation and 3D reconstruction. Measurements and statistical shape modeling of the midfacial skeleton were performed. Our results show a distinct sexual dimorphism in the midfacial skeletal structure across all age groups. Women typically had a narrower bizygomatic width by 1.5 mm (  = 0.04), a shallower maxillary depth by 1.6 mm (  < 0.01), and a midfacial vertical height that was 4 mm shorter than that of men (  = 0.018). In contrast, men exhibited a greater distance between the frontozygomatic sutures by 5.4 mm (  < 0.01), a 3-mm greater interorbitale distance (  < 0.01), and a 2.1-mm wider infraorbital foramina distance (  = 0.007). There were no significant differences in the pyriform and maxillary angles (  = 0.15 and  = 0.52, respectively). Our analysis of midfacial skeletal anatomy revealed sexual dimorphism differences. Men exhibited more pronounced facial features than women, with a broader horizontal midfacial skeleton, a longer midfacial vertical height, and greater maxillary depths compared with women.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2169-7574
2169-7574
DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006215