Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve Restriction to those with aortic dilatation is not justified

• Published in: Netherlands heart journal Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 207 - 211
• Main Authors: Cozijnsen, L., Braam, R. L., Bakker-de Boo, M., Otten, A. M., Post, J. G., Schermer, T., Bouma, B. J., Mulder, B. J. M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Houten Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 01-04-2022
• Subjects: Cardiology; Medical Education; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original; Original Article; Family screening; Congenital heart disease; Bicuspid aortic valve
• ISSN: 1568-5888; 1876-6250
• DOI: 10.1007/s12471-021-01621-3

Aim
To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and isolated aortic dilatation in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with isolated BAV and to explore the recurrence risk of BAV in different subgroups of probands with BAV. Recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines recommend family screening in patients with associated aortopathy only.
Methods
During follow-up visits, patients with isolated BAV received a printed invitation for their FDRs advising cardiac screening.
Results
From 2012–2019, 257 FDRs of 118 adult BAV patients were screened, among whom 63 (53%) index patients had undergone aortic valve surgery (AVS), including concomitant aortic replacement in 25 (21%). Of the non-operated index patients, 31 (26%) had aortic dilatation (> 40 mm). Mean age of the FDRs was 48 years (range 4–83) and 42% were male. The FDR group comprised 20 parents, 103 siblings and 134 offspring. Among these FDRs, 12 (4.7%) had a previously undiagnosed BAV and 23 (8.9%) had an isolated aortic dilatation. FDRs of the probands with previous AVS (
n
 = 147) had a risk ratio for BAV of 2.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–8.10). FDRs of the probands with BAV and repaired or unrepaired aortic dilatation (
n
 = 127) had a risk ratio for BAV of 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.66).
Conclusion
Screening FDRs of patients with isolated BAV resulted in a reasonable yield of 14% new cases of BAV or isolated aortic dilatation. A trend towards an increased risk of BAV in FDRs was observed in the probands with previous AVS, whereas this risk seemed to be diminished in the probands with associated aortic dilatation. This latter finding does not support the restrictive ACC/AHA recommendation.