The in vivo impact of computer navigation on screw number and length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 30; no. 10; pp. e629 - e635
• Main Authors: Hones, Keegan M., King, Joseph J., Schoch, Bradley S., Struk, Aimee M., Farmer, Kevin W., Wright, Thomas W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-10-2021
• Subjects: baseplate screws; Glenoid baseplate screws; intraoperative computer guidance; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; RSA; RSA baseplate screw length; RSA baseplate screw quantity; screw length; screw placement; Treatment Study; RSA; baseplate screws; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Glenoid baseplate screws; screw length; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Level III; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; intraoperative computer guidance; screw placement; RSA baseplate screw quantity; RSA baseplate screw length
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.017

Little information exists regarding the benefit of computer navigation in shoulder arthroplasty in the clinical setting. This study aimed to quantify how computer navigation affects the number and length of screws used during in vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) placement.
We performed a retrospective review of a research database to identify patients who underwent primary RSA before and after the use of computer navigation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. One hundred consecutive RSAs were selected from the computer navigation implantation date; then, 100 consecutive sex-matched RSAs were chosen prior to navigation implantation in reverse chronologic order. Baseplate augmentations were chosen based on surgeon discretion, with the goal of restoring version to within 10° of neutral and inclination to neutral or slightly inferior with removal of the smallest amount of subchondral bone possible. Screws were placed with the goal of ≥3 screws with good purchase and were added as needed, with up to 5 screws used. We compared demographic factors, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, number of screws, screw length, number of wasted screws, and number of cases with bone graft used behind the baseplate between the 2 groups. We used the χ2 test for bivariate analysis and the Student t test for continuous variables.
A total of 200 RSAs were included, with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.3 years) performed prior to computer navigation compared with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.7 years) performed using computer navigation. The total number of screws used in RSAs without computer navigation was 414; the total used in the computer navigation cases was 344. RSAs placed with computer navigation used significantly fewer screws per case (3.4 screws vs. 4.1 screws, P < .001) and had a significantly greater average screw length (35.0 mm vs. 32.6 mm, P < .001). Three screws were implanted in 61% of computer navigation cases vs. 1% of cases without computer navigation (P < .001). Screws ≥ 30 mm in length were more commonly used in patients undergoing RSA using computer navigation (84.6% vs. 73.7%, P < .001).
This study shows that computer navigation in RSA leads to longer and fewer glenoid baseplate screws being implanted. Computer navigation appears to assist with better screw placement, which may have similar clinical benefits of better glenoid fixation. Additionally, using fewer screws can save glenoid bone stock, avoid added glenoid stress risers, and decrease operative time.