Barriers to Surgical Outcomes Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

• Published in: The Journal of surgical research Vol. 290; pp. 188 - 196
• Main Authors: Mughal, Nabiha Akhlaq, Hussain, Muzamil Hamid, Ahmed, Kaleem Sohail, Waheed, Muhammad Talha, Munir, Muhammad Musaab, Diehl, Thomas M., Zafar, Syed Nabeel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-10-2023
• Subjects: Barriers; Developing Countries; General Surgery; Humans; Low- and middle-income countries; Performance of routine information system management; Registries; Surgical research; Treatment Outcome; Surgical research; Low- and middle-income countries; Barriers; Performance of routine information system management
• ISSN: 0022-4804; 1095-8673
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.017

Systematic collection and analysis of surgical outcomes data is a cornerstone of surgical quality improvement. Unfortunately, there remains a dearth of surgical outcomes data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To improve surgical outcomes in LMICs, it is essential to have the ability to collect, analyze, and report risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity and mortality data. This study aimed to review the barriers and challenges to developing perioperative registries in LMIC settings.
We conducted a scoping review of all published literature on barriers to conducting surgical outcomes research in LMICs using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and GoogleScholar. Keywords included ‘surgery’, ‘outcomes research’, ‘registries’, ‘barriers’, and synonymous Medical Subject Headings derivatives. Articles found were subsequently reference-mined. All relevant original research and reviews published between 2000 and 2021 were included. The performance of routine information system management framework was used to organize identified barriers into technical, organizational, or behavioral factors.
Twelve articles were identified in our search. Ten articles focused specifically on the creation, success, and obstacles faced during the implementation of trauma registries. Technical factors reported by 50% of the articles included limited access to a digital platform for data entry, lack of standardization of forms, and complexity of said forms. 91.7% articles mentioned organizational factors, including the availability of resources, financial constraints, human resources, and lack of consistent electricity. Behavioral factors highlighted by 66.6% of the studies included lack of team commitment, job constraints, and clinical burden, which contributed to poor compliance and dwindling data collection over time.
There is a paucity of published literature on barriers to developing and maintaining perioperative registries in LMICs. There is an immediate need to study and understand barriers and facilitators to the continuous collection of surgical outcomes in LMICs.