ADP-Induced Recalcified Blood Clotting Time as a Marker of Rethrombosis Risk and Effectiveness of Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

to assess the possibility of the use of ADP induced blood-clotting time measurement in clinical practice prognostication of the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and assessment of effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy (APT). We enrolled in the study 163 male patients admitted to the coronary u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Kardiologiia Vol. 58; no. 6; p. 5
Main Authors: Malinova, L I, Furman, N V, Dolotovskaya, P V, Chernousova, L A, Denisova, T P
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Russian
Published: Russia (Federation) 01-01-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:to assess the possibility of the use of ADP induced blood-clotting time measurement in clinical practice prognostication of the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and assessment of effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy (APT). We enrolled in the study 163 male patients admitted to the coronary unit for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 38 male practically healthy volunteers (PHV). ADP induced blood-clotting time (ADP BCT) was measured as time (sec) between addition of ADP (10 μcmol) to recalcificated sample of citrate blood and clot formation. In healthy volunteers ADP BCT was determined before and 45 minutes after oral administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 250 mg). Risk of cardiovascular death was calculated using the GRACE score. Platelet function tests were performed by optical aggregometry. Follow-up period for patients with ACS was 24 months. The primary end point (PEP) was the composite of cardiovascular death and rehospitalization. In ACS patients ADP BCT was significantly lower than in PHV: 134.8 (109.9; 161.3) vs 85.7 (60.5; 108.7) sec, p=0.015. In PHV ASA increased ADP BCT - 103.2 (95.1; 130.7) vs 133.1 (102.8; 154.3) sec, p=0.041. ADP BCT correlated with age in both PHV and patients (R= -0.431, p.
ISSN:0022-9040
DOI:10.18087/cardio.2018.6.10128