Reliable prediction of heat transfer coefficient in three-phase bubble column reactor via adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and regularization network

• Published in: Heat and mass transfer Vol. 54; no. 10; pp. 2975 - 2986
• Main Authors: Garmroodi Asil, A., Nakhaei Pour, A., Mirzaei, Sh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-10-2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adaptive systems; Artificial neural networks; Bubble columns; Convection; Engineering; Engineering Thermodynamics; Filtration; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy systems; Heat and Mass Transfer; Heat transfer coefficients; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering; Inference; Liquid phases; Original; Regularization; Silicon dioxide; Slurries; Software; Temperature; Thermodynamics
• ISSN: 0947-7411; 1432-1181
• DOI: 10.1007/s00231-018-2332-4

In the present article, generalization performances of regularization network (RN) and optimize adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) are compared with a conventional software for prediction of heat transfer coefficient (HTC) as a function of superficial gas velocity (5–25 cm/s) and solid fraction (0–40 wt%) at different axial and radial locations. The networks were trained by resorting several sets of experimental data collected from a specific system of air/hydrocarbon liquid phase/silica particle in a slurry bubble column reactor (SBCR). A special convection HTC measurement probe was manufactured and positioned in an axial distance of 40 and 130 cm above the sparger at center and near the wall of SBCR. The simulation results show that both in-house RN and optimized ANFIS due to powerful noise filtering capabilities provide superior performances compared to the conventional software of MATLAB ANFIS and ANN toolbox. For the case of 40 and 130 cm axial distance from center of sparger, at constant superficial gas velocity of 25 cm/s, adding 40 wt% silica particles to liquid phase leads to about 66% and 69% increasing in HTC respectively. The HTC in the column center for all the cases studied are about 9–14% larger than those near the wall region.