Obesity and Response to Advanced Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective We performed a study of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) compared to non‐TNFi biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis to test whether body mass index (BMI) modified the effect of each therapy. Methods We utilized data from CorEvitas. We studied 3 clinical outcomes based on the Cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis care & research (2010) Vol. 74; no. 11; pp. 1909 - 1916
Main Authors: Baker, Joshua F., Reed, George, Poudel, Dilli Ram, Harrold, Leslie R., Kremer, Joel M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Boston, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01-11-2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective We performed a study of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) compared to non‐TNFi biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis to test whether body mass index (BMI) modified the effect of each therapy. Methods We utilized data from CorEvitas. We studied 3 clinical outcomes based on the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at 6 months from therapy initiation: 1) achievement of low disease activity (LDA); 2) a change as large as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID); and 3) the absolute change. We categorized BMI and utilized restricted cubic splines to consider nonlinear associations. We used linear and logistic regression to evaluate associations with response, adjusting for confounders. To determine if comparative effectiveness of therapy varied by BMI, we tested for interactions between BMI and class of therapy. Results The sample included 2,891 TNFi and 3,010 non‐TNFi initiators. Among all initiators, those with severe obesity experienced lower odds of achieving LDA or MCID and less improvement in CDAI score, although associations were attenuated with adjustment. Low BMI was associated with reduced response rates in adjusted models including lower odds of LDA (odds ratio 0.32 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.15, 0.71], P = 0.005). Analyses stratified by TNFi and non‐TNFi therapies demonstrated no differences in clinical response rates for TNFi versus non‐TNFi across BMI categories (all P for interaction >0.05). Estimates for non‐TNFi biologics fit within the 95% CI for TNFi. Conclusion This study observed lower response rates among obese and underweight patients and no evidence of a superior effect of non‐TNFi therapy over TNFi therapy in particular BMI categories.
Bibliography:The opinions or assertions presented herein are the private views and opinions of the authors and do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Supported by the Corrona Research Foundation. Dr. Baker's work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs (Clinical Science Research and Development Merit award [grant I01 CX001703] and Rehabilitation Research and Development Merit award [grant I01 RX003644]).
.
Author disclosures are available at
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1002%2Facr.24867&file=acr24867-sup-0001-Disclosureform.pdf
ISSN:2151-464X
2151-4658
DOI:10.1002/acr.24867