National survey of nurse home visitor collaboration with health care and social services

• Published in: Public health Nursing Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 825 - 836
• Main Authors: Williams, Venice Ng, Brooks‐Russell, Ashley, McManus, Beth M., Yost, Elly, Olds, David L., Tung, Gregory J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-09-2021
• Subjects: Child; Childrens health; Collaboration; Community nursing; Coordination; Cross-Sectional Studies; Delivery of Health Care; Dietary supplements; Early intervention; Families & family life; Female; Health care; Home Care Services; House Calls; Housing; Humans; Infant; Infants; Internet; Interorganizational networks; Interpersonal relations; interprofessional collaboration; Maternal & child health; Maternal child nursing; Measures; Medical personnel; Mental health; Mental health services; Multidisciplinary teams; nurse home visiting; Nurses; Nurses, Community Health; Nutrition; Polls & surveys; Poverty; prevention; Public health; relational coordination; Social services; Social Work; Supervisors; United States > US; nurse home visiting; prevention; relational coordination; interprofessional collaboration
• ISSN: 0737-1209; 1525-1446
• DOI: 10.1111/phn.12897

Objective
To assess the degree to which nurses in a national public health home visiting program collaborate with interprofessional providers to serve families experiencing adversity.
Design
A descriptive, cross‐sectional survey measured collaborative practices between nurse home visitors, health care, and social service providers. A census of 263 nursing supervisors completed a web‐based survey.
Measurements
The survey included the validated 7‐item Relational Coordination Scale, adapted items from the Interagency Collaboration Activities Scale on shared resources, and items related to collaboration attitudes and beliefs. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
Results
Relational coordination scores, which are relative measures, ranged from 1 to 5; highest with supplemental nutrition for Women, Infants & Children (M = 3.77) and early intervention (M = 3.44); and lowest with housing (M = 2.55). The greatest sharing of resources was with supplemental nutrition (sum = 12.95) and mental health providers (sum = 11.81), and least with housing (sum = 7.26); with a range of 1–30 where higher scores indicated greater resource‐sharing.
Conclusion
Home visiting nurses collaborate with interprofessional providers with variation in the degree of collaboration between agencies and by provider type within an agency. Collaboration was a function of two interrelated domains: interpersonal relationships supported by organizational and contextual factors at the systems‐level.