The role of minimally invasive hepatectomy for hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review of the literature

Despite the fact laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) for cholangiocarcinoma is still limited, this systematic review addressed surgical and oncological outcomes of LLR to treat both perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Five comparative and 20 noncomparative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical oncology Vol. 121; no. 5; pp. 863 - 872
Main Authors: Shiraiwa, Daniel K., Carvalho, Parisina F. D. C., Maeda, Carlos T., Silva, Luciana C., Forones, Nora M., Lopes‐Filho, Gaspar J., Linhares, Marcelo M., Araujo, Raphael L. C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-04-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite the fact laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) for cholangiocarcinoma is still limited, this systematic review addressed surgical and oncological outcomes of LLR to treat both perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Five comparative and 20 noncomparative studies were found. Regarding iCCA, LLR had lower blood loss and less need for Pringle maneuver. However, open liver resections (OLR) were performed more for major hepatectomies, with better lymphadenectomy rates and higher number of harvested lymph nodes. High heterogeneity and selection bias were suggested for iCCA studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.25821