Patient perspectives on infection prevention and control in cancer care: a survey of knowledge and attitudes among persons with cancer and their next of kin

• Published in: The Journal of hospital infection Vol. 146; pp. 21 - 30
• Main Authors: Danielsen, A.S., Nygaard, N.J., Børseth, A.W., Nilsen, J.V., Øvreness, H., Raastad, R., Borg, M.A., Kacelnik, O., Bjørnholt, J.V.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-04-2024
• Subjects: Antimicrobial resistance; Cancer; Hand Hygiene; Health Personnel; Humans; Infection Control; Infection prevention and control; Knowledge and attitudes; Neoplasms - therapy; Patient perspectives; Pilot Projects; Survey; Surveys and Questionnaires; Survey; Knowledge and attitudes; Antimicrobial resistance; Infection prevention and control; Patient perspectives; Cancer
• ISSN: 0195-6701; 1532-2939
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.012

With the growing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, there may be a need to strengthen infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in cancer care. When developing clinical guidelines, it is important to incorporate patient perspectives.
To determine the knowledge of, and attitudes towards, IPC among persons with cancer and their next of kin in Norway.
Through discussions in expert panels and a pilot study, a survey was developed consisting of 13 knowledge statements to be judged true/false and 40 attitude items to be judged using a Likert scale and was sent to a panel of people with cancer experience on August 22nd, 2023. The mean correct responses and attitude scores were reported.
Of 551 respondents, the mean correct response to IPC-related knowledge questions was 79% (95% confidence interval: 78–80). Respondents were most knowledgeable about hand hygiene (99%, 546/551), but least knowledgeable about its role in preventing antibiotic resistance (41%, 225/551). Strong support was noted for IPC, especially within the patient responsibilities theme, with a mean score of 4.83. However, there was a notable reluctance towards some selected intrusive IPC measures, such as reducing contact with close relations.
This survey revealed a high level of knowledge and attitudes that support the importance of IPC among persons with cancer in Norway and their next of kin. We recommend including patient perspectives in future development of IPC guidelines.