Clinical study on the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of flurbiprofen
Summary Flurbiprofen (CAS 5104-49-4) is a member of phenylaikanoic acid derivative group of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs. It exhibits anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activities. Two different tablets containing flurbiprofen (FLU) were investipted in 24 healthy volunteers to prove...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 1 - 5 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Paris
Springer-Verlag
01-01-2009
Médecine & hygiène |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Flurbiprofen (CAS 5104-49-4) is a member of phenylaikanoic acid derivative group of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs. It exhibits anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activities. Two different tablets containing flurbiprofen (FLU) were investipted in 24 healthy volunteers to prove the bioequivalence between both treatments after single oral dose administrations. Fluroben
®
100 mg tablet and 100 mg tablet of the originator product were used as test and reference preparation respectively. The study was performed open label, randomized, two period cross-over design with 15 days wash out period. Blood samples were taken up to 24 hours for pharmacokinetic profiling. The plasma concentrations of flurbiprofen were determined with validated HPLC-UV method. Maximum plasma concentration (C
max
) of FLU 19 143.65 ng/ml and 19 164.22 ng/ml were found for test and reference formulation respectively. Areas under the plasma concentration time curve AUC
0-∞
of 118 501.4 ng.h/ml and lii 339.8 ng.h/ml were calculated test and reference formulation respectively. Primary target parameters AUC
0-∞
and C
max
, both of them were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA); 90% confidence intervals were between 100.5%–111.18% for AUC
0-∞
and 87.6%–115.0% for C
max
. All these values were within the acceptance range (80%–125%) for bioequivalence studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-7966 2107-0180 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF03191376 |